General Notes and Correspondence

( 􀀅14 ) 􀀓enernl fl!,otcss nntl 􀀔oncssponncncc. In refe1·ence to a remark in Arch. Gant., Vol. XXXVI.,. p. 166, by the reviewer of Mr. Charles Igglesden's book, Mr. A. H. Tay lor of East Ham writes to point out that theKing in question was Henry m., the date 1264, and that the-­ incident itself, which occurred at Flimwell, is to be found related in Farley's History of the Weald of Kent, vol. ii.,, part 1, pp. 83 and 84.