Some Documents concerning the building of Cowling (Cooling) Castle and Cobham College

( 52 ) SOME NEW DOCUMENTS CONCERNING THE BUILDING OF COWLING CASTLE AND COBHAM COLLEGE BY D. KNOOP, G. P. JONES AND N. B. LEWIS. THE architectural achievements of John, lord Cobham, the fourteenth century lord of Cobham and Cowling, have received frequent attention in the pages of Archceologia Cantiana,1 and although lord Cobham is most widely known for the part he played in the national politics of Richard II's reign, his erection of the castle at CowUng and of the coUege at Cobham constitute, from the local point of view, a claim to remembrance no less vahd and enduring. In an early volume of Archceologia Cantiana2 some Ught was thrown on the buUding operations at CowUng by the printing of a number of contemporary masons' receipts and indentures preserved among the muniments at Surrenden. It is now possible to add some further details from a simUar coUection of deeds preserved among the Harleian Charters in the British Museum3 and printed in fuU in a recent issue of Ars Quatuor Coronatorum.4 One of these (Harl. Chart. 48.E.46) dated the 25th of January, 1383, refers to Cobham CoUege, and is a receipt by a local mason, Robert atte Pette of " Lodisdon" (i.e. Luddesdown, two mUes south of Cobham), for £2 2s. 6d. for work done in the " colegue et skolehous de Cobham." The nature of the work is not specified in the receipt but presumably it was some smaU repair or alteration needed since 1 E.g. I I , 95 ; XI, 77 and 128 ; XVIII, 447; and XXVII, 64 and 110. 2 II, 95. 3 Harleian Charters 48.E.37, 39, 41, 42, 44 and 46. 4 " Some building activities of John, lord Cobham," by D. Knoop, G. P. Jones and N. B. Lewis, in Ars Quatuor Coronatorum (being the transactions of the Quatuor Coronati Lodge), Vol. XLV, pt. i. pp. 48-53. COWLING CASTLE AND COBHAM COLLEGE. 53 the erection in 1362.1 The mason, Robert, does not seem to figure in any other of lord Cobham's buUding transactions, but he may have belonged to the same family as Thomas atte Pette, who appears in the Fabric Roll of Rochester Castle as a suppUer of stone.2 The remainder of the six new documents aU deal with CowUng Castle and give us further insight into the detaUs of its erection. Some of the old documents record payments to the London mason, Thomas Wreck, and the London plumber, WUUam Roberts, and it is, perhaps, more likely that their work was done on Cobham's London property than on his castle in Kent.3 But the documents which do exphcitly deal with Cowling show that the principal contractor was Wittiam Sharnhale, to whom lord Cobham owed no less a sum than £456 for his work there, whUe smaUer amounts (ten marks, sixty shiUings, eight pounds etc.) were paid to other workers, Thomas Crump, WUUam Bestcherche and Lawrence atte Wood. One of the new documents (Harl. Chart. 48.E.39) also records a smaU payment of £10 to Sharnhale, though this amount is not necessarUy to be added to the above total of his dues, since it was an advance payment made in December, 1381, for work to be done in the foUowing season, and was very possibly included in the sum of £270.10.4. acknowledged in the following July.4 The other four documents aU deal with the work of Thomas Crump, and show that he took a much more considerable part in the buUding of the castle than the older documents indicated. One of these (Harl. Chart. 48.E.42),5 is merely a bond for £60 given by Crump to Cobham in September, 1381, as surety for the fulfilment of his indentured contract to 1 " The Chimney-piece in Cobham Hall," by Canon Scott-Robertson, Arch. Cant., XVIII, 447. 2 Ars Quat. Cor., XLV, 50 and " The Fabric Roll of Rochester Castle," Arch. Cant., II, 115. 3 Ars Quat. Cor., loc. cit. 4 Arch. Cant., II, 98. 5 It is not stated explicitly in Harl. Chart., 48.E.37, 41 and 42, that the payments are for work at Cowling, but the description of the work hardly leaves it in doubt. 54 COWLING CASTLE AND COBHAM COLLEGE. make " machecolynges " before the foUowing Christmas. Another (Harl. Chart. 48.E.41), dated on the 24th of September, 1381, is a receipt for £10 received by Crump in part payment of £30 due for making " machecolynges " while an endorsement on the document notes that Crump had subsequently received another £25 through Adam Colind, " irmonger." But the most Uluminating and interesting of the documents are the two indentures (Harl. Chart. 48.E.44 and 37), dated respectively the 26th of September and the 18th of October, 1381, which detail the work done or to be done and the payment to be received by Crump. The first contains Crump's account for building the great gateway of the castle, which, according to his measurement, contained eight and a quarter perches of waU in one tower, seven and three quarters in the other, and one perch of waU between the two, making a total of seventeen perches. For this he was to be paid at the rate of £2 per perch, so that with another £10 due for supplying freestone, he had earned £44. Since, however, he had already received £46.16.8., on account, that left him £2.16.8. in Cobham's debt, and when his measurements came to be checked by Henry Yevele, it was found that he had overestimated the extent of his buUding by more than two perches, so that out of the £46.16.8. he had received he had only earned £39. He was, moreover, in debt to Cobham for a " pasterne" (? a postern gate) in accordance with a previous indenture, and for 366 feet of corner-stone at 5d. a foot. The second indenture specifies in very minute detaU a number of smaUer constructive works. Crump was to undertake ten " arketholes " each three feet long, without cross, and with fittings (" paraU "), internaUy and externaUy : seven little doors (" petitz huis ") each two and a haU feet wide, of suitable height (" ove le hautesse de les ditz huis come affiert "), with fittings internally and externally : fiftyfour " nowaUes " (newels, presumably for the wmding stair of the towers), each four and a haU feet long and seven inches high, and thirty other " noweUs " three feet long and seven COWLING CASTLE AND COBHAM COLLEGE. 55 inches high : fifty-three corbels, one foot square and " of a good and suitable length " for machicolations: and forty-two stones for half-arches, the said arches and corbels to be " nettement chauffreiez." For aU this, and for carting the stone to Maidstone,1 Crump was to receive £20. Although, therefore, Crump's activities were not on as large a scale as those of Sharnhale, he was entirely responsible for the buUding of the great gateway, and, apparently, for the machicolations and other fittings. This rather strange employment of two large-scale mason-contractors on the same buUding may perhaps be explained by a difference in the nature of the stone required for different parts of the work. One of Crump's indentures2 teUs us that he was a local mason of Maidstone, and he may weU have belonged to the same famUy as Ralph Crump, who in 1368 supphed hard stone from the quarries at Boughton (some four miles S. from Maidstone) for work at Rochester Castle.3 If this surmise is correct, Thomas Crump was presumably caUed in as an auxiliary at CowUng, for those parts of the castle which required the special Boughton stone. It is, at any rate, interesting to know that one of the principal contractors was undoubtedly a local man.* One other matter concerning which the new documents give corroborative detail is the relation of lord Cobham with Henry Yevele. The old documents showed that Yevele checked the measurements of Sharnhale's work at Cowling. Another document among the Harleian Charters5 shows that he designed some alterations made by Cobham to St. Dunstan's Church in Tower Street, London (the street in 1 Apparently the stone was taken from the quarry (see below) to Maidstone to be transported down the Medway. A later endorsement leaves it uncertain whether Crump was responsible for transporting the newels from Maidstone to Cowling or not. 2 Harl. Chart., 48.E.44. [Ed.] The family were Otham masons. 3 Ars Quat. Cor., loc. cit. and Arch. Cant., II, 112-4. * Sharnhale was also, in all probability, a local man, though his residence is not stated in any of these deeds. His name, at any rate, appears in connection with work at Rochester in 1368. See Ars. Quat. Cor., XLV, 51, and Arch. Cant., II, 123. 5 Harl. Chart., 48.E.43, printed in Ars Quat. Cor., Vol. XLII, p. HI. 5 6 COWLING CASTLE AND COBHAM COLLEGE. which Cobham had his town house)1 and an entry on the Close RoU shows them associated in oversight of repahs at Canterbury in 1386.2 The new documents, showing that Yevele also checked the measurements of Crump's work at Cowling (and evidently it was no mere formaUty), confirm the impression that he was " Cobham's architectural adviser, though whether he planned and designed CowUng Castle these documents do not show."8 1 See Harl. Chart., 48.E.42. 2 Cal. of Close Rolls (1385-9), pp. 121 and 207. 3 Cobham's choice of Yevele for this position is an indication of the' keenness of his interest in architectural matters, Yevele being one of the leading masons of his day and cariying through important works for both Edward III and Richard II. For his career, see H. Wonnacott, " Henry Yvele, the King's Master Mason," in Ars Quat. Cor., XXI, p. 244, and Knoop and Jones, "Henry Yevele and his Associates," Journal of the Royal Institute of British Architects, 1935. The latter article contains, some additional information concerning the Crump family.