CANTERBURY EXCAVATIONS JUNE-DECEMBER, 1947
No. 5 WATLING STREET
By FRANK JENKINS
DURING the period June to December, 1947, excavations were carried
out by Mr. John Boyle and the writer in theh spare time, on the north
side of Watling Street, in the cehar of the blitzed Manse adjoining the
Lady Huntingdon Chapel site on the side nearest the Riding Gate.
The cehar area was roughly rectangular in shape and measured 28 ft.
north-south, and 20 ft. 6 in. east-west, the cehar floor being at 7 ft. 6 in.
below the surface level of modern Watling Street (i.e. 35-8 ft. above
O.D.).1
The object in choosing this site was to determine the full width of
the Roman footings discovered during the August-September, 1945
excavations, and which lie under the modern party wall separating the
two sites.2 The excavations were carried out under the auspices of the
Canterbury Excavation Committee.
FEATURES BY PERIODS : ROMAN
THE RUBBISH PITS
Pit R I (No. 8 on site plan)
A large and shallow pit, oval in plan, was originally dug from the
surface of the clean yehow brickearth. (Key deposit No. 1.) The
upcast from this pit was found to lie mainly towards Watling Street.
The very large quantity of coarse pottery found in the fihing displayed
many early characteristics, much of it being assignable to the mid-first
century Claudian occupation, especially hi the lowest layer of dark
brown loam, but the associated Samian ware did not permit a date
earlier than Domitianic times for when the pit was finally filled in.
Pits R II and R III (Nos. 6 and 7 on site plan)
Of the other Roman pits found on this site, little can be said. Pit
R I I lay mainly outside the excavated area under the north wah of the
cellar, and R III had been almost completely destroyed when a large
Medieval pit was dug. Thus it was practically impossible to determine
the exact date at which they were open, and in consequence best left
undecided. The fillings of both yielded only Roman pottery of first
century type.
1 For convenience in recording the long axis of the site is said to lie North-
South, as in the 1946 report, although it is in fact North-east-South-west.
2 Arch. Cant., LX (1947), pp. 87-100.
114
CANTERBURY EXCAVATIONS JUNE-DECEMBER, 1947
THE ROMAN FOOTINGS
The Roman footings discovered in the 1945 excavations were found
and the east edge was traced for a length of approximately 18 ft. northsouth,
but badly mutilated by Medieval pits. Sufficient remained,
however, for it to be determined that the total width was about 10 ft.
6 in. Unfortunately, at the southern end they had been destroyed by
CANTERBURY
EXCAVATIONS
1947
m N9 5 WATLING 5T
O
m
OT \ \ z
70
O
U) >
in 10 8
Rl
o AI
M t .r.r /.S-».? FOOTINGS
LOAM
MODERN
P I Ml
FOOTINGS
NATURAL
GRAVEL
FIG. 2. Sections A-Al and B-Bl
the present site, for from more recent research it seems clear that the
suggested waterlogging could not have taken place at this level in
Roman times. Though on the present site not a single object of any
period was found in this deposit by which it could be dated, it can be
assumed with some confidence that the two deposits are homogeneous
and are, therefore, of equal date, namely Claudian, as was proved in the
1945 excavations.
Deposit No. 2 consisted of brown loamy soil about 1 ft. in thickness.
This was dated by a coin of Trajan and a small quantity of pottery, not
later than mid-second century in character. The division between this
deposit and that which succeeded it (No. 3) was marked by a thin band
of clean yellow loam which was taken to be a turf line, for it covered the
whole of the excavated area. Deposit No. 3 which consisted of dirty
brown soil and which varied from 9 in. to 1 ft. 6 in. in thickness appeared
to have been dumped in one operation, for it contained a considerable
117
CANTERBURY EXCAVATIONS JUNE-DECEMBER, 1947
quantity of late thhd-early fourth century pottery and a coin of
Salonina. The final deposit (No. 4) survived to a thickness varying
from 9 in. to 1 ft. 6 in. below the modern cellar floor, was black soil.
This was dated by late' fourth-century pottery, associated with coins of
Constantine I and Valens. Thus the ground level hereabouts had been
raised during the Roman period some 4 ft. from Claudian times to the
end of the fourth century.
THE SAMIAN WARE
(a) FROM P IT R I (No. 8 on site plan). DECORATED
1. Form 30. Style of MVRRANVS, two groups of gladiators :
(1) O.1020 and 1013 G, with dropped shield.
(2) O.1013 A and 1013 B.
Ornament below similar to that on Form 29 his style London (B.M.).
Dogs (0.1963) and a smaller dog (0.1964); Griffin (O.880). His
special ornament in St. Andrews Cross as on 29 OF MVRRAN retrograde,
Richborough ; and on 29 OF MVRRAN retro : London (G.H.)
The piece, however, shows some affinity to the work of LICINVS.
Period Claudian, A.D. 40-50. (Fig. 3, No. 1.)
2. Form 30. Style of LICINVS, Sheep (0.1855) ; and monkey
(0.2145), together as on Form 30 Kempben with his ovolo. (Knorr,
T.S.1919, 95 B). Hare (O.2071). Period Claudian, A.D. 40-50. (Fig.
3, No. 2.)
3. Form 29. , Style of MVRRANVS. The lower frieze is identical
with that of a Form 29 stamped OF MVRAN retro. ; Mainz. (Behrens,
Maimer Zeitschrift, X, 1915, Abb. 24). Bear (0.1586) in upper frieze.
Same arrowheads as on Form 29, OF MVRRA, London (L.M.). High
glaze. Period Claudian, A.D. 40-50. (Fig. 3, No. 3.)
4. Form 37. Style of VITALIS. His ovolo and festoons as on
Form 29 stamped OF VITA Neuss (Knorr T.S. 1919, 83 D). His
ovolo and serrated leaves with a rosette above and between the leaves
on Form 37 VITALIS style, London (G.H.). His tendril binding.
Goose (O.2220) ; hare in festoon (O.2107) ; dog (O.2034) ; hare in
scroll (0.2104 smah). Period Vespasian, A.D. 70-80. (Fig. 3, No. 4.)
5. Form 37. Probably by M CRESTIO. It has been much
blurred in extraction from the mould. The dog (O.1920) and the hare
(O.2072) occur on Form 37 stamped M CRESTIO at Holt (Grimes,
Holt No. 70), and the same ovolo. The same dog and hare occur
together on Form 37, M CRESTIO, Mainz (Knorr T.S. 1919 Text
Fig. 17 E). The two cupids are 0.434 and 0.393 smah variety. Period
Domitian, c. A.D. 90-100. Note a smah fragment of this bowl was found
in the 1945 excavations on the adjacent site (cf. Arch. Cant., LX, PI.
VI, p. 96), where it was tentatively dated as Vespasianic. [With the
118
CANTERBURY EXCAVATIONS JUNE-DECEMBER, 1947
''W^M
IWaUIWJIUMJIwJ!
O0OH0KP
«*
5A sAssesss^
uvvvuuvntjmiiijv
£SiE!ll
FIG. 3. Decorated Samian Ware (J)
119
CANTERBURY EXCAVATIONS JUNE-DECEMBER, 1947
finding of most of this bowl in the present excavations it is evident that
the former piece is simharly dated, and in consequence the date must be
brought forward to Domitianic times (F.J.).] (Fig. 3, No. 5 and 5A.)
6. Form 27. Two examples with the same peculiar stamp which
is meant to read the same when the cup is reversed GMOIVD. The
slanting strokes do not join together and this is apparently intentional.
It has been deciphered as CN01SD by Loumy at Vertault (Hermet, p.
234), by Hermet himself at La Graufesenque, (Hermet 202) and at
Avenchen (Lausanne Museum) (Hermet 242). It may, therefore, be a
stamp of the potter CNOIVS, this stamp also occurs at Vertault. The
stamp CNOIVS occurs on a Form 37 at Bonn and Mainz. Since these
two cups have a groove on the foot-stand they would be earlier than
Vespasian and may be regarded as Neronic, c. A.D. 60-70.
7. Form 18. Stamped MARTIALIS W, by Martialis of La
Graufesenque. Diameter 264 mm.; Period Nero-Vespasian, A.D. 60-70.
8. Form 27. Stamped OF SEVERI retrograde. There were
two potters of this name at La Graufesenque (Nero-Flavian) and at
Lezoux (Hadrianic), respectively. If the date of this cup is the latter
then the presence of one hah of the base in Pit R I and the other in
Key Deposit No. 2 low level, may be explained by regarding it as a
stray piece which found its way into the pit when the site was eventually
levelled off.
9. Form 23. Diameter 114 mm., closely similar to Ritterling 11A,
(cf. Ritterling, Hofheim, XXXI, 11A, and O. & P., L, 6). Period
Claudian, A.D. 40-50.
10. Form 35. Diameter 88 mm. (cf. O. & P., LIII, p. 8) High
glaze. Period Domitian, c. A.D. 90-100.
11. Curie 11. Without barbotine leaves; with weh marked
moulding undercut as 0. & P., LXXI, 14, and similar generahy to this
specimen from Pfunz, but larger, diameter including flange 120 mm.
High glaze. Probably Domitianic, c. A.D. 90-100.
(b) FROM BROWN SOIL INTO WHICH FOOTINGS WERE SUNK
12. Form 29. Style of BILICATVS. A piece of this bowl was in
the cohection from the adjacent site. (Cf. Arch. Cant., LX, PI. VI, 2,
p. 94), identified by Dr. Oswald as the work of BILICATVS. On this
frieze just the head of the same cock is visible in the medallion, and
giving the nearly complete St. Andrews Cross as well as the same
straight wreath in the upper frieze. Period Claudian, A.D. 40-50.
(Fig. 3, No. 6.)
(c) INCORPORATED IN THE ROMAN FOOTINGS
13. Form 37. Probably by VITALIS, his chevron wreath and
trefoil wreath. Period Vespasian, A.D. 70-80. (Fig. 3, No. 7.)
120
CANTERBURY EXCAVATIONS JUNE-DECEMBER, ]947
14. Form 18. (Cf. 0. & P., XLV, 12). Probably Vespasianic,
c. A.D. 70-80.
15. Form 27. Too small for exact dating, but probably
Vespasianic.
(d) FROM IMMEDIATELY OVER FOOTINGS IN BROWN SOIL
16. Form 37. Rather thick. Ovolo of DIVIXTVS as on Form
37 his style at Bahnuhdy (cf. Miher, Balmuildy, XXXIII, 21), and on
37 DIVIX F, Carlisle and Leicester. Period Antonine, A.D. 140-50.
17. Form 27. Cf. O. & P., XLIX, 16. Period probably Trajanic,
A.D. 110-20.
(e) KEY DEPOSIT No. 2
18. Form 37. Figure, legs only. Probably Trajanic, c. A.D.
110-20.
19. Form 18/31. Diameter c. 184 mm. ; side 33 mm. Probably
Trajan-Hadrian, c. A.D. 110-20.
20. Form Ludowici Tg, similar to O. & P., LX, 1. Period
Antonine, c. A.D. 140-50.
21. Form 27. Stamped [DON]TIOIIICI (i.e. Dontio Feci), by
DONTIO of Lezoux. Period Hadrian-Antonine, c. A.D. 130-40.
(/) KEY DEPOSITS No. 3
22. Form 45. Of. 0. & P., LXXIV, 1, but with a little smaller
side, 44 mm. Quartz gritted on the interior. Lezoux ware.
(g) UNSTRATIEIED, FROM PIT NO, 1.
23. Form 18. Stamped OF ING by INGENVVS of La Graufesenque.
Period Claudian, A.D. 40-50.
COARSE POTTERY
(a) GREY BROWN LOAM BENEATH ROMAN FOOTINGS (Fig. 4, Nos. 1-20
inclusive)
1. Cooking-pot, slightly thickened rim ; off-set at base of rim ;
smooth soapy black ware with combed decoration. Belgic. Cf.
Richborough I, 21. Claudian.
2. Imitation Gaho-Belgic platter; soapy reddish-brown ware.
Claudian.
(b) INCORPORATED IN ROMAN FOOTINGS
3. Imitation Gaho-Belgic platter; soapy reddish-brown ware.
Claudian.
121
CANTERBURY EXCAVATIONS JUNE-DECEMBER, 1947
^
8 /
^^
I
10
2 n
13 t \
5
14
r»i v\ «5 17
16 a •UST'XS&ZSi.
19
18 y
\\ ^ / ^
20
FIG. 4. First-century Coarse Pottery (J)
122
CANTERBURY EXCAVATIONS JUNE-DECEMBER, 1947
(c) KEY DEPOSIT No. 1 SURFACE
4. Small carinated jar with sharp off-set at base of neck. Sandy
light reddish-brown ware. Claudian.
5. Jar with everted rim and off-set at base of neck ; brown ware,
light reddish-brown at surface. Burnished soapy coating on neck ;
decorated with row of stab marks on shoulder ; combing below. As
pieces of this pot also occurred in Pit R I it was evident that from the
surface of this deposit the pit was originally dug. Claudian.
(d) PIT R I (No. 8 on site plan)
A large quantity of pottery representing many types of vessel
occurred in the filling of this pit. Owing to hmitations of space in this
report only the more significant pieces are illustrated. •
6. Bead rim jar in hard sandy grey ware, light reddish-brown at
surface ; slight off-set at base of short neck ; burnished on rim and
neck ; combing below. Belgic. Claudian.
7. Bead rim jar in hard brown ware, fumed black at surface ;
traces of black varnish on neck; horizontal grooving below. Belgic.
Claudian.
8. Imitation Gaho-Belgic platter ; coarse grey ware with soapy
light brown surface (Claudian). This came from the primary filling of
this pit.
9. Flagon top with two-ribbed handle. Buff ware. Flavian.
10. Wide-mouthed carinated bowl with tall everted neck, and
short shoulder ; decorated with a zone of burnished lattice lines below.
Thick native ware with smoothed soapy coating. Cf. Camulodunum
Form 223. Claudian.
11. Imitation Gaho-Belgic bowl with slightly rising base and
outward curved side ; small half round moulding at base of inner wall
and on upper side of base. No foot-ring. Hard grey ware, no doubt
in imitation of terra nigra fabric, but inferior in quality. Claudian.
12. Upper part of an amphora with cylindrical neck and peaked
handles. Pale buff ware. This type occurred at Hofheim (11 B.CA.
D. 16), and at Richborough, mid-first century A.D. ; cf. Richborough I,
No. 25.
13. Small carinated beaker in thin brittle black varnished eggshell
ware. Illegible stamp on under-side of base. Claudian. Cf.
Camulodunum Form 120.
14. Carinated beaker in grey ware, decorated with zones of sawtoothed
wavy lines and rouletting.
15. Small jar with thickened bead rim. Hard sandy grey ware.
16. Hemispherical cover in hard grey ware.
17. Smah bowl with upright neck and pronounced carination.
Hard grey ware.
123
CANTERBURY EXCAVATIONS JUNE-DECEMBER, 1947
18. Storage jar with tah outward curved neck, with rudimentary
cordon at base of neck ; stabbed decoration and combing below.
Coarse native ware; burnished soapy coating on neck. Belgic.
Claudian.
19. Large straightish walled bowl with rounded carination,
grooved above and below, and having everted rim slightly beaded to
accommodate a lid. Fine buff ware. Cf. Camulodunum Form 243.
Pre-Flavian. One other example of similar form having a level rim
but in sandy, fumed grey ware also came from this pit.
20. Part of the side and base of a large storage jar, in coarse grey
ware, corky in the break, with soapy, hght reddish-brown coating. A
zone of horizontal ruling just above base, burnished hnes on body and
with pyramidal bosses placed at intervals around ghth decoration of
incised herring bone pattern.
The pottery described below also came from Pit R I, but is not
illustrated.
A platter in terra rubra, coated on the upper side with red colour
coating, evidently a copy of Drag. Form 18. The lip is delimited
internahy by a groove.
Three examples of native bowls in imitation of Drag. Form 30, in
grey ware. Decorated with obliquely placed finely combed bands on
the body, or with a saw-toothed wavy line pattern as on No. 14 above.
Appear to be dated to the period A.D. 80-100.
Fragments of thin, pinkish-buff ware with applied decoration of dots
and chcles on barbotine. Cf. Wroxeter, II, PI. XV, 9.
Pieces of native butt-beakers in fine hard, white clay, but too small
for identification of exact form.
Jars with cordoned necks, in fine grey ware, as also in thick native
ware, Flavian and Claudian types. For the former cf. Arch. Cant.,
LX, p. 80, Fig. 6, Nos. 3 and 4.
Fragments of two-handled flagon identical in shape and fabric with
one found at 47 Burgate Street Canterbury and at Richborough.
Cf. Arch. Cant., LXIII, p. 103, Fig. 12, No. 40 ; and Richborough III,
No. 188 ; dated A.D. 50-80, probably earher in the period.
Finally the usual large native storage jars which are a feature of the
first century deposits in Canterbury, were represented by a large
quantity of fragments.
(e) FROM KEY DEPOSITS Nos. 3 AND 4 (Fig. 5, Nos. 21-35 inclusive)
Pottery from these deposits was found in quantity, especially
Deposit No. 3. The examples hlustrated are representative of the
collection. Key Deposit No. 3 contained a coin of Salonina, and No. 4,
coins of Constantine I and Valens.
21. Cavetto rim jar. Hard grey ware with burnished black
124
CANTERBURY EXCAVATIONS JUNE-DECEMBER, 1947
coating extending over neck to inner edge of lip. Several examples
were found in this deposit.- Key Deposit No. 3.
22. Funnel-necked beaker in fine, hard grey ware, with polished
black coating. Key Deposit No. 3.
23. Mortarium in buff ware. Wroxeter type 174. Cf. Wroxeter I,
Fig. 20, p. 79. A.D. 270-330.
24. Mortarium in buff ware. Rim section simhar to one found at
47 Burgate Street, Canterbury, but with more pronounced bead. Cf.
Arch. Cant., LXIII, p. 105, Fig. 13, No. 57. This type, to the present
Avriter's knowledge, had until quite recently only occurred in fourthcentury
deposits in Canterbury, but the presence of one example in an
Antonine deposit just west of Whitehall Road shows that the former
are almost certainly survivals in rubbish, and in consequence may be
dated to the end of the second century. Key Deposit No. 3.
25. Mortarium, hammer-head type. Greyish buff ware. Key
Deposit No. 3.
26. Mortarium in pinkish-buff ware with vertical rim and hooked,
beaded lip on inside. A second example with the same rim section in
similar ware, but with a smooth white coating (not illustrated), came
from the same deposit. Key Deposit No. 3. Cf. Richborough IV,
No. 515, not later than c. A.D. 275-300.
27. Mortarium with small, almost vertical rim. Hard grey clay,
fired duh red at surface. A slightly larger example was found with it.
{Not ihustrated.) Key Deposit No. 3.
28. Mortarium, bead and flange type ; grey clay, light red at
surface and coated with cream coloured slip. Quartz gritted on inner
surface. Fourth century. Key Deposit No. 4.
29. Mortarium, bead and flange type, in same fabric as No. 28
above, which was found with it. Fourth century. Key Deposit No. 4.
30. Mortarium in hard light red clay, much flint gritted on inside
and having a reeded, beaded rim. Key Deposit No. 3.
31. Mortarium with hemispherical body, corrugated on exterior.
Hammer-head type ; in buff ware with horizontally grooved rim.
Fourth century. Key Deposit No. 4.
32. Platter of light brown clay with dark red coloured coating.
Fourth century. Key Deposit No. 4.
33. Funnel-necked folded beaker, with small weh moulded lip and
band of rouletting on shoulder. Fine, thin cream-coloured ware with
dull copper coloured coating. Key Deposit No. 3.
34. Large bowl in coarse grey ware decorated with burnished lines
on neck. A.D. 300-40. A simhar bowl occurred in the fourth century
orchestra filling at the Verulamium theatre. Cf. Archaologia,
LXXXIV, Fig. 11, No. 17. Key Deposit No. 4.
125
CANTERBURY EXCAVATIONS JUNE-DECEMBER, 1947
35 and 35a. Castor ware hunt cup. Late second to third century.
Key Deposit No. 3.
(/) FROM PIT No. 5 (S I) (Fig. 5, No. 36)
7 21 23
;
22
FIG. 5. Roman Coarse Pottery from stratified deposits except No. 36 from lato
Saxon Pit No. 5 (J)
36. Hand-made and uneven cooking-pot with neck splayed
outwards at a sharp angle to the shoulder. Dark grey, fairly hard,
much gritted clay with smoothed black surface extending over rim to
inner edge of lip. The associated pottery consisted of a small quantity
126
CANTERBURY EXCAVATIONS JUNE-DECEMBER, 1947
of fragments indeterminate as to form, but certainly of late Roman date.
Associated smah finds were a smah tanged knife-blade of scramasax
form and a fragment of a clay bun-shaped loomweight of ninth-tenth
century type (qv).
THE COINS
By B. H. ST. J. O'NETL, F.S.A.
1. CUNOBELINUS
Obv. CVN. Victory 1. Rev. Eagle-gryphon. (Cf. Evans, British
Coins Supplement, PL XXII, 12.)
Pit R I. Gravel below primary filhng.
2. TRAJAN
Obv. Emperor's bust laureate, r.
IMP TRAIANO AVG. GER DAC PM TRP.
Rev. Aequitas with cornucopia and scales. 1.
COS V PP SPQR OPTIMO PRINC. (Cf. B.M.C., Roman Empire
III, p. 71, Nos. 281-287).
A.D. 101-111. Key Deposit No. 3.
3. SALONINA
Obv. SALONINA AVG. Bust diad. dr. r. on crescent.
Rev. illegible. Antoninianus. A.D. 253-268.
At 1 ft. 4 in. in Key Deposit No. 3.
4. CLAUDIUS II
Obv. IMP. C. CLAVDIVS AVG. Head rad. r.
Rev. FELICITAS AVG. Felicitas 1. with long caducous and
cornucopia, mint Rome. M&S 32.
Antoninianus. A.D. 268-70. Pit M I.
5. CONSTANTINE I
Obv. IMP. CONSTANTINVS AVG. Bust helmeted cuir. 1.
Rev. VICTORIAE LAETAE PRINC. PERP. Two victories
facing and holding shield. Mint PEN (London) 3iE.
A.D. 320-24. Key Deposit No. 4.
6. CONSTANTINE I
Obv. ]TI NVS MAX AV[G. Bust diad. dr. cuir. r.
Rev. GLORIA EXERCITVS. Two soldiers and standard. 3 ^.
Mint ., j ' A.D. 335-37. Pit M I.
127
CANTERBURY EXCAVATIONS JUNE-DECEMBER, 1947
7. PROBABLY BARBAROUS FEL. TEMP. REPARATIO
Legionary spearing fallen horseman. 4iE size (small),
c. A.D. 350 or later. Key Deposit No. 4.
8. VALENS
Obv. D.N. VALEN S. PF. AVG. Bust diad. and draped, r.
Rev. SECVRITAS REIPUBLICAE. In field OF I.
Securitas 1. Mint LVGP (Lyons).
A.D. 364-78. Key Deposit No. 4.
ANIMAL REMAINS
Animal bones from this site were submitted to the British Museum
(Natural History Dept.) for examination. The following animals were
represented in the cohection :
PitRI
Sheep, Pig, Ox, and Roe Deer.
Pit R II
Ox (juvenile).
Key Deposit No. 3
The lower jaw and femur of a very young dog.
SMALL FINDS
OBJECTS OF BRONZE
(a) Pit R I
1. Bronze spoon. (Fig. 6, No. 6.)
2. Bronze tweezers, length 5 in. (Fig. 6, No. 5.)
3. Bowl of spoon.
4. Tweezers, length 1-25 in. (since crumbled). Thin strip metal
with in-turned tips.
5. Bronze pin.
6. Bronze pin, length 3 in.
7. Two bronze pins or nails, length f in.
8. Angular object.
9. Nail cleaner, once part of a chatelaine.
10. Smah umbo or boss.
(b) Key Deposit No. 4
1. Finger-ring with key attached. (Fig. 6, No. 8.)
2. Tweezers, 2-5 in. in length. (Fig. 6, No. 4.)
3. Nail, c. 1-25 in. in length.
4. Spht ring, c. 1 in. outside diameter.
5. Penanular brooch with conical-shaped terminals.
128
CANTERBURY EXCAVATIONS JUNE-DECEMBER, 1947'
(c) Key Deposit No. 3 (surface)
1. Bronze mount in the form of three trumpets derived from the
classical pelta motif. Has three rivets on back for attachment to
leather or some other material (Fig. 6, No. 7). This design is not
Q Q $ 4
7
5
8
•EFT U 2 o
3 14 15
VH "T