Excavations at St. Martin's Hill, Canterbury, 1984-85

EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL, CANTERBURY, 1984-85* JONA THAN RADY With contributions by Pan Garrard, Nigel Macpherson-Grant, Margaret Sparks and Tim Tatton-Brown I. THE EXCAVATION 1. Introduction Between October 1984 and February 1985 an excavation by the Canterbury Archaeological Trust took place in advance of proposed residential development, in an area of open ground owned by the Diocese of Canterbury known as the 'Conduit Meadow' or mistakenly as 'The Glebe'. The excavation and subsequent post-excavation work was entirely funded by the H.B.M.C., and much of the workforce supplied by the M.S.C. scheme. The 'Conduit Meadow', which has remained undeveloped ground for nearly 200 years,1 lies immediately south of St. Martin's Church and churchyard, about 2/3 km. (½ mile) east of Canterbury. To the south it is enclosed by the main Canterbury to Sandwich Road (now St. Martin's Hill) and properties and back gardens along its frontage and by the southern part of North Holmes Road ( originally called Church Lane) to the west (see Figs. 1 and 15). The proposed development, which included two houses along the St. Martin's Hill frontage, as well as garages and landscaped ground • Published with the aid of a grant from English Heritage (Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England). 1 Apart from 'Glebe House' which was built in the north-east corner in 1976. 123 JONA THAN RADY to the rear, determined to some extent the areas which were investigated. Two trenches (A and B) were cut against the road frontage in the area destined for re-development. Three trenches (D, C and C') were dug in a line north from Trench B to a point about 17 m. south of St. Martin's Church. The size and exact position of these trenches were determined by the presence of numerous trees, including two very large weeping willows, and a running stream, as well as time and manpower constraints. A final trench (E) was excavated adjacent to North Holmes Road. Excavation was virtually continuous throughout the severe winter and the bad conditions were exacerbated by the presence of running ground water (the site is on a spring line)2 and a thick overburden of re-deposited impervious clayey subsoil. 2. General Summary The excavation produced no evidence for Roman occupation. More specifically, the lack of evidence for Roman burials suggests that St. Martin's Church may have originated as a Roman domestic building (a villa?) rather than a eel/a memoria in a cemetery as had previously been suggested. The first occupation evidence dated from c. A.D. 750. Although only truncated rubbish pits and a probably contemporary metalled track survived, important associated artefacts and quantities of residual Saxon pottery supplement other recent Saxon finds in the vicinity, all of which probably relate to a wic type settlement, to the north-east of Canterbury. The metalled track on the west side of the site was almost certainly an important route which connected Canterbury with Fordwich. The track may have originated at a much earlier date. Although a hiatus in activity between the middle Saxon and the late eleventh century is evident in the excavated deposits, this may be due to repeated landscaping and other disturbances of the site which occurred from the late medieval period, since the documentary record hints at the possibility of a continuity of settlement through the late Saxon period around St. Martin's Church. Although most of the 'Conduit Meadow' area has always been open ground, traces of timber structures, dating to the thirteenth century, were discerned. From this time, at least part of the road frontages were always occupied by buildings. A succession of timber buildings and associated levels along St. Martin's Hill were revealed. 2 Ground water hampered the excavation of Trenches C', C, D and parts of Trench B, and often precluded total investigation of deeper features. 124 ftO CANTERBURY - 1000 / / / • Cremation i o Inhumation / I ==== Roman streets I / i I/ i i i i i i I i Ei j //JI .;i j '"'i i i i i i i I \ St Martin's ::;;,i I r.---=,--\ Fig. 1. St. Martin's Hill 1984: Roman Topography on the east Side of Canterbury. tO"l..--· .,,.-·-· ,/ JONATI-IAN RADY A substantial increase in population from c. 1400 is suggested by the excavated levels and perhaps from documentary records, and by the early to mid-sixteenth century, most of the main road frontage between Church Lane (which evolved from the earlier Saxon track) and a large house (later called 'St. Martin's Priory') to the east was developed. Most of these buildings were dwellings, although documentary material indicates the presence of a ropery and a brewery in the sixteenth century. From their initial construction some of the buildings appear to have suffered from structural instability, which resulted in phases of re-furbishment and eventual re-building in the mid-seventeenth century. These structural problems were partly due to differential compaction of pits and clay quarries dug prior to c. 1500. However, the presence of drainage gullies to the north and drains under the buildings suggest that surface water from the hiUside and also ground water emerging from a spring at the north-east corner of the meadow may have been a factor. Two phases of landscaping and terracing approximately contemporary with the building developments of the early sixteenth and mid-seventeenth centuries were suggested by the stratigraphy. The terracing, which probably affected the entire area between the churchyard and the main road, removed much of the earlier stratigraphy and therefore imposes qualifications on the interpretation of the pre-sixteenth century periods. From the mid-seventeenth century, the general topography of the site has hardly altered. The field to the north probably became gardens after the second phase of terracing ( as shown on the Doidge map of 1752) and most of the partially-brick, post-medieval houses along St. Martin's Hill are still in existence (Plate VII). Due to the inadequate nature of the city water supply at this time, the City Burghmote began to take an interest in the site. After negotiations with the owner of the land, the spring-water emerging at the north-east corner of the meadow was utilised by the installation of a conduit. The water-pipes probably ran east-west down the hill, south of an avenue adjacent to the churchyard, that led to St. Martin's Priory. None of the pipes were located during the excavation, probably because the northern boundary of the 'Conduit Meadow' has since moved to the south (indicated by various maps of the area). Due to certain disputes with the owners of the meadow, the City decided in 1673 to buy the entire estate, which included the houses on the now vacant plot between nos. 7 and 9 St. Martin's Hill. By 1792 these particular properties had been demolished and the councilowned land was bounded on the south, east and west by brick garden walls. 126 EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL From this time until 1976 the whole of the 'Conduit Meadow' has remained as open ground. 3. The Geology The site occurs on an outcrop of the Thanet Beds, comprising a sequence of Palaeocene clays, clayey sands and sands. In the area of the 'Conduit Meadow' the Thanet Beds have weathered, to produce a relatively impermeable layer of clayey 'brickearth', coating the side of the hill. Springs (one of which is situated in the north-east corner of the 'Conduit Meadow') emerge from the underlying water-bearing sand beds, where the surface 'brickearth' is perforated. The natural profile of the hillside was impossible to establish, as a result of extensive medieval and post-medieval terracing (see Fig. 16). 4. The Area in the Roman Period Although the site is well outside the Roman city wall, it lies immediately to the north of the Canterbury to Richborough Roman road, in an area previously believed to be within a major Roman cemetery (Fig. 1). Both cremation and inhumation burials have been found within the grounds of St. Augustine's Abbey3 and, in 1926, a dozen or more cremation burials were uncovered during building work on a new estate south of the main road (adjacent to the Mill House Inn) about 400 m. east of St. Martin's Church.4 St. Martin's Church, situated just north of the present excavations (Fig. 2), is first mentioned by Bede5 and its possible Roman origin has been the subject of much speculation by past historians. Architecturally, the earliest parts of the surviving fabric ( the west end of the chancel and the nave) almost certainly date from between the late-Roman period, up to the seventh century at the latest.6 The possibility that St. Martin's Church was situated within a Roman cemetery has led to theories that it may have evolved from a eel/a memoria or Roman funerary building. 3 Excavated by D. Sherlock in 1974 and by the Canterbury Archaeological Trust (R.J. Pollard, 'Two Cremations of the Roman Period from St. Augustine's College, Can4 terbury', Arch. Cant., xcvii (1981), 318-24). W. Whiting and H.T. Mead, 'A Roman Cemetery at St. Martin's Hill, Canter• bur_t Arch. Cant., xl (1928), 67-78). Bede, A History of the English Church and People, trans. L. Sherley-Price, (Pe6n guin Classics 1955), 70-1. For a fuller discussion of this aspect of the Church, see T. Tatton-Brown. 'St. Martin's Church in the sixth and seventh Centuries', in (Ed.) Margaret Sparks, The Parish of St. Martin and St. Paul, Canterbury: Historical Essays in Memory of James Hobbs, (1980), 12-18. 127 mO Period I: c. 750 - c. 850/900 / / "(j' '1 . . I 372,bf' , Trend, 0 LJ, - lote Rornon-1C61h - '? 1th CMtury .... lt0 100 Fig. 2. St. Martin's Hill 1984: Overall Plan of Period I (Saxon) Features and general Saxon Topography (inset). / I I I I I r-7• I . Trench A􀀗/ m􀀂􀀃, 􀀄􀀅.m! C A pF,;o , •11.fAre: --- --􀀋 R SE: 0 F -----------: __ 30 (1' 􀀆 TrenchC'Ll• . . ,.. I 􀀃ZJ /--J/ Trench B . ,. -=----- :it. EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL Medieval and later terracing, which may have entailed substantial reduction of the original ground surface in the area (see p. 148) and, therefore, the removal of much of the pre-fourteenth-century stratigraphy, is very likely to have destroyed much of the evidence for Roman occupation. However, the paucity of Roman pottery and small finds, residual in the backfill of truncated Saxon and early medieval pits7 and the complete absence of the basal remains of Roman features (which would probably have survived the terracing)8 strongly suggest that little or no Roman occupation of any sort occurred in the immediate vicinity. A comparison between the almost total absence of Roman material and the relatively large-scale survival of Saxon evidence (see p. 132) reinforces the above conclusion. This important negative evidence and the fact that St. Martin's lies some distance from the present-known limits of Roman cemeteries (the cremations found to the east may, in fact, be associated with a Roman settlement on the top of the hill, separate from Canterbury) suggest that no late Roman cemetery existed immediately in the area of the church. Whilst the origins of the church as a cella memoria now seem unlikely, if the west end of the chancel of St. Martin's is of Roman build, then the structure may have been a domestic building, perhaps part of a villa. 9 Although most Roman artefacts were absent from all the levels on site, a significant quantity of residual Roman brick and tile was found, mainly from Saxon or early medieval features. This material may have derived from nearby Roman buildings, or may have been imported from further afield for re-use during the construction of the nave and chancel of St. Martin's Church. 5. Period I - mid to late Saxon (Figs. 2 and 3) (a) SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION All features of this period were truncated and sealed by medieval deposits. The first major occupation of the site took place during the 7 Only ten Roman pot-sherds were recovered from the entire excavation. 8 Especially at the southern end of the site, where the ground level was possibly only reduced to the level of natural subsoil. This is near the Roman street, where any Roman activity might be expected to concentrate. Only three features may have been pre-Saxon (E437, B386 and B387) but their backfills were sterile. 9 See also T. Tatton-Brown and N. Macpherson Grant, 'Anglo-Saxon Canterbury, Topography and Pottery', Current Archaeology, no. 98, 89-93. 129 JONATHAN RADY mid-to-late Saxon period (c. 750-850, possibly up to 900 at the latest). Virtually no early Saxon activity was identified and no Saxon structures were found, although evidence for any present may have been destroyed by later terracing. However, the relatively large number of rubbish- or cess-pits, some of which contained significant quantities of mid-late Saxon pottery, specifically imported Ipswichtype wares (see pottery report, p. 180), and the quantity of residual Saxon pottery recovered throughout the site, does suggest extensive Saxon occupation. This occupation may have been associated with a wic type settlement on the north-east side of the city .10 The most important topographical element located during the excavation was a north-east/south-west aligned metalled track, which later developed into the southern part of the present-day North Holmes Road. Although no direct dating evidence for this feature was recovered, it was almost certainly extant by the middle Saxon period and may have been much earlier. The track may have developed from a sunken way, or was possibly terraced into the hillside. The quality of the original metalling and subsequent continuous repair to the road surface suggest that it was a route of some importance, primarily connecting St. Martin's Church to the old Roman road to the south, and possibly extending further to connect the 'Little Burgh of Fordwich with Canterbury (see p. 203). (b) THE SAXON TRACK A small segment of the eastern verge of a metalled track, aligned approximately south-west/north-east, was excavated in Trench E. To the west, the feature was completely destroyed by a later clay quarry (E440) .11 The roadway was composed of a 20 cm. thick deposit of gravel and rounded flints in a matrix of dark olive-grey silty clay (E445) laid within a shallow depression that cut into natural brickearth (Fig. 19, W-X). This depression may have been a sunken way eroded by cartwheels but no evidence for ruts was observed. Apart from some animal bone, only one sherd of pottery, dating to the first half of the ninth century, was recovered. This primary metalling was 10 Discussed in more detail on p. 202. Similar pottery to that found at St. Martin's has recently been discovered during salvage work during the construction of two new buildings at Christ Church College, ('Interim Report on Excavations in 1984 by the Canterbury Archaeological Trust', Arch. Cant., ci (1984), 294-6). 11 During the excavation all contexts were numbered in sequence regardless of trench. For publication purposes all the context numbers in the text have been prefixed with the appropriate letter. 130 Period I Periods I I & III f Edge of road 44 3 ---- ----- X 0 0/ y mo 5 Jz. ft 0 15 Fig. 3. St. Martin's Hill 1984: Detail Plans of Trench E: Periods I and II/III. 131 X 43lJ 0 0/ 􀀄 11.;, Oq7 .J ----------✓' y JONATHAN RADY sealed by a re-surfacing (E443A) which overlapped the primary track. The later metallings are discussed in Period II (s·ee p. 138). A U-shaped gully (E442) that ran parallel to the track was also found. No relationship of gully to track could be postulated, however, since the fill of E442 was totally sterile and completely truncated by the later quarry (E440) (Fig. 19, W-X). The date of the track Although there was no stratigraphical and little artefactual evidence to prove that the track was of Saxon origin, the general concentration of Saxon pits (see below) along its frontage and their respect for its position strongly suggest its. use at this time. ( c) THE SAXON PITS (Figs. 2 and 3) The pits and other features of this phase divide into two groups: (a) Pits which contained Anglo-Saxon material, and (b) Features that have been placed in this period because of their stratigraphical position and the nature of their fills. Some of these might be earlier in date than the pits in Group (a). Group (a) Nine definitely Saxon pits (A274, A320, B379, B423, C368, D372, E296, E396, E432) were excavated. Most of these were truncated and sealed by medieval or post-medieval levels (so that the depths given in Table 1 refer to the depth below the level of natural subsoil). The fills of the pits were generally similar, usually uniform buff-brown clays, containing animal bone, pebbles and Roman bricks and tiles. Pottery, either dating to the late eighth-ninth or ninth-tenth century, including Ipswich-type wares from pits C368, E396, E432, was recovered. Pit B423 was excavated to a depth of about 2.10 m. and contained a generally homogeneous fill of slightly pebbly brownish-grey clay, flecked with charcoal, burnt clay and brickearth (Fig. 18, G-J). The fill produced six sherds dating to c. 775-850, animal bone, some Roman brick, slag, stone, daub lumps and a few nails. The depth and profile of this feature suggest that it may have been a well. Pit C368 contained an important group of c. 800-825/50 pottery, as well as a Saxon bone comb (S.F. nos. 378, 379) and loom-weight fragment (S.F. no. 334). The fill, which was a very organic and glutinous dark brown loamy clay, also yielded animal bone, Roman 132 EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL brick and tile, fired clay and a quantity of other, mainly decayed, bronze objects. Pit D372 also contained considerable quantities of organic material. The grave-shaped pit E396 produced a key group of Saxon pottery, dating to c. 800-850/75. The grey-brown loamy clay fill which contained pebbles, charcoal flecks and lumps of light buff clay also yielded animal bone, slag and a residual early fourth-century coin (S.F. no. 343). Pit E432, in the south side of the trench, was immediately sealed by a primary metalling of a medieval track (E431, Fig. 19, Y-Z). This deep, vertical-sided, rectangular pit was not bottomed for safety reasons, but excavated to about 1.40 m. The fill was varied, but generally consisted of yellow and buff-brown clay and loamy clay, interspersed with lenses of gravel and re-deposited brick-earth, and lightly flecked with carbon. This pit produced a fine ninth-century bronze strap-end (S.F. no. 354) as well as pottery dating to c. 825- 875/900. Animal bone, Roman tile, and nails were also found. TABLE 1 Pit Depth (m.) A274 0.50 A320 0.75 B379 c. 0.80 B423 not bottomed C368 1.05 D372 0.50 E396 1.55 E397 not bottomed E432 not bottomed Group (b) Pits A321, A331 and A332 all contained virtually sterile fills, which produced no datable material. AU were truncated anq sealed by medieval deposits relating to Period III, Building M2A. Only the lowest 10 cm. of pit A321 survived as a sub-rectangular patch of olive-grey clay in the brickearth. Pit A332 was virtually identical in shape, size, alignment and backfill to the Saxon pit A320, to safely include it in this period. This feature was cut by Pit A331 (Fig. 17) which was circular and 60 cm. deep. This contained various lenses of light buff-brown to dark 133 JONATIIAN RADY grey-brown clays, which only yielded animal bone and a few Roman tiles. Pits B386 and B387 were stratigraphically earlier than the ninth or tenth-century pit B379. The backfill of both was completely sterile. B386, which was 0.50 m. deep, contained a uniform dirty-grey silty gravel, possibly re-deposited Roman street metallings. Pit 387 was not bottomed due to the presence of flowing ground water. A 50 cm. depth of the fill, a sticky orange gravelly clay, was excavated. Pit D371 adjoined and was in an identical stratigraphical position to D372, but was not fully investigated because of water problems. The fill, a light, greenish-grey clay, flecked with carbon and shell, yielded animal bone and Roman tile. Four other features were excavated in Trench E (Fig. 3). All were truncated and sealed by later medieval deposits. Pit E419 was 70 cm. deep; the complex fill included deposits of variously coloured clays, re-deposited brickearth and gravel. The feature appeared to cut the Saxon pit E397 (Fig. 19, W-X) but only contained two sherds of worn and probably residual Ipswich-type ware. Only a small part of feature E433 extended into the trench. This contained a sterile fill of buff-brown clay. Pit E437 contained a similar sterile fill, of which only a 20 cm. depth survived. It was, however, cut by the ninth- or tenth-century pit E396. Feature E424, a post-hole, contained mixed orange and grey clay and loam. The feature was 12 cm. deep. 6. Period IA - c. 850/900-c. 1075/80 Documentary evidence (see p. 205) indicates that in the ninth century a small settlement (villula) existed near the church of St. Martin. However, virtually no material evidence for a later Saxon phase was discovered, and although it is possible that features of this period were totally destroyed by later landscaping, various factors (similar to those affecting the determination of the extent of Roman activity (see p. 129) suggest that no occupation of this period occurred, at least, not in the areas investigated. 7. Period II - c. 1075/80-c. 1400/1425 (Figs. 3, 4, 5) (a) SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION (Fig. 4) Excavated features of this period were truncated and disturbed by later medieval and post-medieval terracing of the hillside, which had also removed any horizontal deposits. Documentary evidence (see p. 208) suggests that by the early 134 i i I i i i Period ll :c.1075/80-c.1400/25 St. Augustine's Abbey Cellarer's Garden (from mid 13th century) St. Martin's Church ,,, i;r e-,.􀀉.....".... -'" 11 -l?'tb-Olh ,fflturiu 􀀕"thn,,tury o// v't :n . I lf􀀃i . I II .,.... iI t􀀖te-d I. i . I .I I I . I L ___ Jv j 􀀇- mOj........,...,...:.....,.,-,-􀀓---'°J.,-----------------===----------------'--' •• 100 Fig. 4. St. Martin's Hill 1984: Overall Plan of Period II and Detail of Trenches C and D (inset). til >: (") ► <: ► :::i 0 z en 􀀈 􀀉 E:: ► § z Cl) :I:.... b I\ I I I I r-- ____ /__ fl I / i i/ l rrench E (see Fig 3 l , j /[ := L 􀀓li􀀔 '-----j-􀀚 ,::... TrenchC /§" I !!!f:!!.,;;-,;;;:-,.... I􀀛 I ...... 􀀈C'.. .............. ,,, ............. -- - ,:o l ------ I. 1·m(􀀅i · 1 /,4 t1 i I /1 Trench D LJ. /_􀀏 ------------------- 1 / J Tr􀀈nche-s A&B ! r--, : / (see f',g 5 l : q -,/ fJ!o;! : I jl;/ ' ·--- 1· I/ . 't 1---i; ... ,,,,.􀀕.......,􀀕+--- ---- '···········--------- ----------- -- 110 􀀙􀀚--...:• ::..• A mO ftO 15 ' I I I 0 􀀅--i- i Truneattd horaon 294 / I I I I I /------_J j Fig. 5. St. Martin's Hill 1984: Detail of Trenches A and B: Period Il. • ... ,v .... .. 􀀃- Truncoted horizon 176 I I J ' I i EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL fourteenth century a small community of houses existed at St. Martin's and, although there may have been continuous occupation from the late Saxon period, evidence for it on site was sparse and only really occurs from the late eleventh or twelfth century, with evidence for structures (Building Ml) from the thirteenth century. During most of this period it is likely that the area was open sward or meadow, bounded on the south by the old Roman road and to the west by a metalled track (and also the boundary wall of the Cellarer's Garden of St. Augustine's Abbey from the thirteenth century). The track (Trench E) continued in use until the middle of the fourteenth century and was re-metalled a number of times. Eventually, its position shifted to the west and assumed the line that is -preserved in the present-day North Holmes Road (Church Lane). Another cobbled track, probably medieval or early medieval in origin, was also excavated in Trench E. This extended east-west across the 'Glebe' from the earlier trackway and, although it became redundant before the middle of the fifteenth century, its line was probably maintained in the later property boundary which still exists to the rear of the gardens of nos. 1-13 St. Martin's Hill (Fig. 15). Clay extraction occurred in the area from c. 1375-1400. A large quarry cut through the track metallings along the North Holmes Road frontage. A similar clay quarry, probably of a later date (Period III) was found in Trench B. (b) TRENCH A (Fig. 15) Building Ml Little remained of this structure, which was severely disturbed by later buildings. A row of five inter-cutting post-holes (A299, A300, A302-A304), which varied in depth from 10 cm. to 45 cm., probably represented the rear wall of the building (Fig. 17, B-C). To the south of the post-holes was a random spread of shallow stake-holes, most of which contained a pale grey clay. All of the above features cut into the natural brickearth and were truncated (Horizon Al 76) and sealed by deposits relating to Building M2A (Period III). No other contexts belonging to Building Ml were excavated and the street frontage wall was not located. Two rubbish pits, both sealed and disturbed by later medieval activity, were also found. Pit A319, which was not fully emptied, contained lenses of variously coloured pebbly clays, flecked and mottled with green-stained brickearth and grey clay. This feature was cut by post-hole A304. Pit A287 to the north contained a fill of dark 137 JONATHAN RADY olive-grey clay and pebbles and yielded eleventh- or twelfth-century pottery and one sherd dated to 1250-75. Building Ml: Dating summary Lack of evidence makes an exact determination of the date of Building Ml impossible. One of the associated post-holes cut the late eleventh- or twelfth-century pit A319 and the stratigraphically latest post-holes contained a few sherds of pottery belonging to the second half of the thirteenth century. These factors suggest that Building Ml originated some time during or after the thirteenth century. The structure was demolished by c. 1400, when it was replaced by Building M2A (Period III). ( C) TRENCH E (Fig. 3) The original Saxon 'sunken way' and its primary metal1ing were superseded by at least three later road surfacings. These remained parallel to the earlier alignment, but encroached to the east by about 2 m. and some were flanked by road drains. The first re-metalling of the street (E443A), consisted of 15-20 cm. of sterile rammed sandy gravel, flanked by a shallow gully (E444) which cut into the natural brickearth. This drainage ditch contained fine lenses of sterile washed brickearth and sandy gravel, and was increasingly truncated to the north (Fig. 19, W-X, Z-Y). These levels were sealed by a thin layer of sterile, pale creamy-grey silty sand and gravel (E444A). The third-metalling (E443) overlaid this deposit and consisted of 15 cm. of pale oliye-yellow rammed S!indy gravel. This metal1ing was sealed by washed clays and re-deposited brickearth dumps (E412B and E412C), which were 20 cm. thick at maximum. The final metalling E412A was composed of a thin layer of sterile light brown gravel and silt, which sealed all the earlier deposits. This was laid in the base of a depression, the edge of which delineated the farthest eastwards extent of the track. Another track, excavated along the south edge of the trench, extended east-wards from the north-south track and may also have originated as a sunken way. This track consisted of two discrete metallings (E431 and E429), laid within a shallow depression, which cut into the natural levels. The base of the depression appeared to be continuous with the surface of metalling (E412A) of the earlier track (Fig. 19, Z-Y). The primary metalling of the east-west track overlay the north-south metalling E412A and consisted of brownish sandy gravel. This was sealed by a 5 cm. thick level of gravelly silty clay and 138 EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL brickearth.(E430), which contained one sherd of thirteenth-century pottery. Metalling E429, a dark brown loamy gravel deposit, sealed this layer and contained one sherd of c. 1275-1350 pot. The latest north-south metallings were covered by homogeneous deposits (E413) of orange-brown clay and re-deposited brickearth containing some gravel. These layers, which contained no useful datable material, were probably a deliberate dump to level up the redundant track, rather than naturally washed material. The west edge of the north-south track and the dump levels over the latest surface were cut away by a large and deep feature {E440). This was almost certainly a clay quarry, which occupied the entire road frontage area of Trench E and cut well into the natural brickearth, although it was not bottomed. The backfill consisted of an homogeneous buff-brown clayey loam, interspersed with numerous tip-lines of small flints, pebbles and oyster shells. Most of the recovered pottery was worn, and probably residual thirteenth- or early fourteenth-century in date, but significant quantities of late fourteenth-century sherds were found. A late Saxon iron knife (S.F. no. 365) was also recovered. The upper levels of the clay quarry merged with a layer of possible garden soil {E410) that eventually built up over the sunken area of the tracks (see Period III). The tracks: Dating summary The age and duration of the individual road surfacings detailed above remains unclear because of the paucity of artefactual evidence. The north-;-south track and its sequence of metalling were, however, continually in use from the Saxon period up to the excavation of the clay quarry (E410), which probably occurred in the second half of the fourteenth century. The chronology of the east-west track is similarly difficult to establish but, because of its superimposition on the final north-south track metallings, it must have originated late in the sequence. A terminus ante quern is provided by a Period III pit (E417) which cut the east-west track and which dated to c. 1400-50. {d) TRENCHES B, C, c' and D. (Fig. 4) During this period most of the 'Conduit Meadow' area was probably open fields or sward although its exact nature cannot be deduced because of the removal of most of the Period II deposits by later landscaping of the site. The only other excavated features of this period consisted of a sparse scatter of six rubbish pits of various dates 139 JONATHAN RADY (B375, C61, C67, C69, C411, C'416) and a possible drainage gully. Pits C67 and C69 were not fully excavated due to severe water problems. The fills were usually dark grey clays and most yielded residual Roman brick and tile as well as pottery ranging in date from the late eleventh or early twelfth century up to c. 1275. Pit B375, the only feature of this period located in Trench B, cut into the natural levels and contained pebbly green-stained brickearth, which yielded pottery dating to 1350-1375/1400. This pit was completely truncated by later terracing (Period IV) and cut by a Period III pit (B330). All of the others were also truncated by terracing to the level of natural subsoil (Horizon 38) and sealed by post-medieval layers. The depths are shown below: TABLE 2 Pit Depth (m.) B375 0.40 C61 1.35 C67 not bottomed C69 not bottomed C411 0.15 C'416 0.30 Three short sections of a shallow gully (C415/D380A), almost certainly a drainage ditch, were excavated in Trenches C and D. The gully varied in depth from 10 cm. to 30 cm., and was irregular in cross-section. The fill, a buff-brown to mid grey-olive clay, contained a few sherds of pot dating up to c. 1325. The gully was severely disturbed by later features and truncated by Horizon 38 (Fig. 19). 8. Period III - c. 1400/25-c. 1500/25 (Figs. 3, 6, 7) (a) SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION Most of the deposits and features of this period were truncated by later terracing and building activity. In Trench E, the east-west track became redundant by c. 1400-25 and was buried under a thick accumulation of garden soil. In c. 1400/25 the earlier Building Ml was replaced by a timber structure supported on masonry dwarf walls (Building M2A). Intensive pit digging occurred to the rear of this structure up to about 1525. 140 ... •• Period m:c.1400/25-c.1500/25 Sl Augustine's Abbey Cellarer's Garden / 100 i l i 􀀃 St. Martin's Church Fig. 6. St. Martin's Hill 1984: Overall PI, • of Period III and Detail of Trenches C and D (inset). 􀀂- ,􀀄-==11 i i ; ; ; i / 00 I I I I I"=· I I I I I . I I I L --J - V mO no Pits dating up to c.1525 r ,,, ,; 15 Pits dating up \O C.\500 N IJ rI __ -- !, Nol excovo:ed Fig. 7. St. Martin's Hill 1984: Detail Plan of Trenches A and B: Period ID. Period III i I d ::li.. D 􀀄􀀅"-- .•-••• 􀀈w I I horizon 294 I .... 0 z I-' A 􀀁 􀀂 J I ' ' ' EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL This increase of occupation, evident from the early fifteenth century, is possibly reflected by the surviving rentals and other documentary material (see p. 209), which indicate that a settled and prosperous community was now in existence. Most of the occupation took place along St. Martin's Hill, although the road frontage was still not fully developed. Many of the property boundaries, some of which still survive, must have been established at this time. A large proportion of the area, however, remained as open ground or meadow. (b) TRENCH A (Fig. 7) Building M2A (Plate 1) Only two rooms, later made into one, of Building M2A were examined. Levels relating to this structure were increasingly sheared off to the north-east by redevelopment (Building M2B). Consequently, the rear wall of the building was not found, but it probably corresponded with the rear wall alignment of Building Ml ( and similarly with the rear wall of the later Structure M2B).12 Any relationship between the internal deposits to surviving stratigraphy at the back was also removed by subsequent building activity. The earliest deposits within the building directly overlay natural brickearth, sealed the Saxon pits and post-hole A300 belonging to Building Ml. This implies a truncation of the ground surface to the level of natural subsoil (Horizon 176) before construction took place. The road frontage dwarf wall (A 77 A) of the building was founded on a raft of large flints and brown clay (A333), set in a construction trench (A323) that cut to a depth of about 20-25 cm. below the construction horizon (A176). The trench was backfilled with a sterile dark olive-grey silty clay. Wall A77A survived to a height of c. 10 cm. and was composed of fijnts in a yellowish-brown mortar (Fig. 17, B-C). The wall and construction trench were truncated and capped by a Period IV wall and its associated construction levels, and therefore neither could be related to the internal levels of the building. The primary occupation consisted of a thin spread of buff-brown clay (A309), which mainly survived where it had slumped into Saxon pit A320. This may mean that the original floor of the building was on the natural brickearth. 12 The east end of the building and the westward limit of the excavated rooms (shown on Fig. 7), have been based on the possible position of later property boundaries. These make the length of the building c. 26 ft. (c. 7.93 rn.). 143 JONATIIAN RADY Overlying this deposit and the natural brickearth were two clay floors (A223A and A223B), cut by a shallow beam slot (A230), which divided the building along its east-west axis. In the north room, clay floor A223A was heavily disturbed and partially removed by later activity. The south side of beamslot A230 was straight and parallel to Wall A 77A . The disturbed and irregular north side of the feature suggested that the original sleeper beam, which must have supported an internal wall, was eventually dug out and removed. The beam-slot was filled with sterile orange brickearth, which was contiguous with the fill of an irregular-shaped feature (A222) that abutted A230 to the north. A222 was of similar depth to A230. Two post-holes (A222A and A222B), 35 cm. and 10 cm. deep, respectively, were both sealed by the backfill of A222, and obviously associated with it. This feature must represent an internal structure, possibly a staircase, adjacent to the dividing wall. The internal dividing walJ and associated structure were eventually demolished probably together, and the two rooms made into one. This involved the extraction of the timber footings (probably levered up from the north side) and the instatement of a new floor surface within the disturbed area. Layer A223A and the backfill of A222 and A230 were mainly sealed by deposits relating to Building M2B (Period IV). In the extreme south-western corner of Trench A, however, heavily disturbed levels probably belonging to Building M2A survived. This sequence of very thin laminated occupation (A322 [Fig. 17], A252 and A249) overlay A223B and consisted of dark brown or black silts and carbon, interlaced with traces of sandy clay and patchy white mortar. A small area of patchy, 2 cm. thick, orange clay (A251), sandwiched in these levels, may have been an intervening clay floor. The sequence was capped by a bi-partite clay floor (A229 and A229A) (Fig. 17, B-C), which may have been cut by the robbing of beam-slot A230. This would indicate that the levels described above belong to the occupation of the south room, prior to the demolition of the internal wall. Numerous stake-holes were found within the building. Most were first observed at the surface of floors A223A and B and contained fills similar to the occupation deposits, or were voids, sometimes plugged with clay or occupation-like material. The exact stratigraphical position of many of these features was difficult and sometimes impossible to establish; to the north, the removal of medieval stratigraphy left the stake-holes truncated and therefore 'floating' in the sequence. The attenuated nature of the internal occupation deposits also made analysis problematical. This may partly explain 144 EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL the random spread of most of the stake-holes, although some straight alignments can be discerned. A possible hearth or oven (A228) overlay clay floor A229. This consisted of a bowl of burnt clay, the internal area of which was sealed by a thin layer of carbon and a dump of yellow clay ( A227) laid after the hearth became redundant. Although these levels were directly sealeq and completely destroyed to the north-east by the later Period IV building, the hearths furthest extent may be indicated by the spread of surrounding stake-holes (Fig. 7). Other features, including four parallel beam-slots (A265, A201-204) were also found. These were of indeterminate function. Feature A306 may have been a post-hole, possibly associated with a rear door. Building M2A; Dating summary Although no exact terminus post quern for building construction was recovered, it almost certainly dates from around the turn of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries up to about 1425. This corresponds to the commencement of large-scale rubbish disposal in pits to the immediate rear of the structure; the earliest pit in the sequence dated to c. 1400/25-1450 (see below). The primary occupation deposit (A309) also contained pottery from the first half of the fifteenth century. Due to the paucity of datable finds an exact chronology of the subsequent internal modifications cannot be defined. However, the pottery found within the backfill of A222 implies that the internal walls and fittings were dismantled after c. 1450. By c. 1500/25 the building had been demolished and was replaced by a new structure M2B (see Period IV). Rubbish pits and other features A complex sequence of sixteen intercutting pits and other features was excavated to the rear of Building Ml (Fig. 7). The digging of these (A275, A279, A288, A289, A290, A308, A311) spanned the fifteenth century and some (A260, A273, A376, A280, A291) may have been backfilled as late as c. 1525. Most were probably contemporary with the use of Building M2A and must represent rubbish disposal by the inhabitants. A.II of these features were truncated by reduced horizons relating to later terracing and building activity (Horizon A140 and A140A, Fig. 17). Most of the pits contained very similar backfills, usually lenses of pebbly dark grey or olive-grey and brown clay, sometimes flecked 145 JONATHAN RADY with carbon. Pits A266, A288 and A289 also contained gravel. Pit A275 yielded a jeton dated 1307-27 (S.F. no. 238) and Pit A291 a mid fourteenth-century rowel (S.F. no. 253). The depth of these pits is shown in Table 3. TABLE 3 Pit Depth (m.) A266 c. 0.70 A273 1.35 A275 1.55 A276 0.35 A279 0.50 A280 1.25 A286 1.45 A288 1.00 A289 not bottomed A290 0.30 A291 0.70 A308 1.35 A311 1.90 Three other features (A281, A292, A318), all heavily disturbed by pit cutting, were also examined. These were either post-holes (A292 contained a depression in its base, possibly the socket for a post) or maybe garden features of some sort. Apart from a few sherds of late fifteenth-century pottery, nothing else was recovered from their backfill. (c) TRENCHES B, C, D and E About ten rubbish- or cess-pits and various other features dating to the fifteenth century were found in most of the other trenches. The largest of these (B310, Figs. 7, 18) was almost certainly a clay quarry and occupied nearly 75 per cent of the area of Trench B, although only two sides of it were located. The feature, which was only partially excavated, was over 2.50 m. deep with a very irregular base and contained a complex sequence of layers (including B295, B324, B374, B420). These were generally pebbly clays, varying in colour from pale olive-grey to black, often interspersed with lumps and flecks of brickearth. The upper fill (B295), which lipped over the vertical sides of the feature, was gravel in a matrix of dark brownishgrey loamy clay, and may have been dumped to level the ground over the quarry. The exact date of this feature is difficult to establish. 146 EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL Large quantities of thirteenth- and fourteenth-century pottery, some obviously residual, were recovered from its backfill. The upper layers (B420 and especially B295), however, contained pottery dating to c. 1425-1450/75. This could suggest that the feature was first dug at some time in the fourteenth century (i.e. contemporary with the clay quarry E440), backfilled over a considerable length of time and finally levelled in the early fifteenth century. However, the heavy subsidence of a Period IV building (M3) probably erected over the quarry shortly after its final backfilling indicated that the fill of the feature was still mainly unconsolidated by the beginning of the fifteenth century. This and the lack of deposits derived from erosion or silting suggest that the quarry was dug and backfilled within a fairly short time-span. The upper levels of the clay quarry were cut by two shallow gullies (B325 and B314). Only a short length of these features was excavated and their function remains unclear. The earliest gully (B325) contained quantities of pottery dating to 1425-50/75, and a thirteenthcentury key (S.F. no. 271). B314 contained a few sherds of c. 1475/ 1500-1525 pottery. The clay quarry was also cut by four pits (B316, B328, B329 and B421, Figs., 7, 18). B328 also removed the western part of both gullies B314 and B325. To the north seven other pits (B330, B385, D226, D376, D377, D395 and E417, Figs. 3, 6, 7, 19) were located. The pits were filled with deposits of clay or loamy clay of differing colour. Features B316, D376, D377, D395, E417 contained quantities of gravel and B385 also contained organic material. Most of the pits yielded fifteenth-century pottery, although some (B316, B328, D377) may have been backfilled as late as c. 1525. B385 only supplied a few residual Saxon and early medieval sherds, but was placed in this phase by its stratigraphic position. The depths of the pits are shown in Table 4 below: TABLE 4 Pil Depth (m.) B316 not bottomed B328 0.10 B329 0.10 B330 0.35 B385 1.00 B421 0.70 B226 0.90 D376 0.80 D377 not bottomed D395 0.55 E417 not bottomed 147 JONATHAN RADY A few other features were also exposed. Shallow post-holes (C407, C408) and an irregular scatter of stake-holes (C85A-C103B), were found in Trench C. Another drainage gully (D380/C415) was also located. This was cut by fifteenth-century pits and contained fifteenth-century pottery. Most of the above features were truncated by the later terracing and usually no contemporary horizontal deposits remained. In Trench E, however, a thick layer of olive-brown loamy clay (E410, E427) survived in the depressions over the earlier metalled tracks. These levels contained residual artefacts, including a thirteenthcentury iron arrowhead (S.F. no. 363) as well as pottery dating to c. 1425-50/75. This residuality may indicate that the deposit was dumped deliberately rather than a gradual accumulation but, whatever its derivation, it was probably garden soil. 9. Period IV - c. 1500/25-c. 1625/50 (Figs. 8, 9, 10, 11) (a) SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION Major changes took place during the first half of the sixteenth century. Extensive landscaping of the hillside probably involved terracing in both north-south and east-west directions ( the latter is still evident in the stepwise ascent of the present properties along St. Martin's Hill) as well as the demolition of Building M2A. 13 This was followed by the erection of a range of timber buildings probably along the entire length of the street frontage now occupied by nos. 1-13 St. Martin's Hill.14 A degree of continuity from the earlier period is evident, however, and it is probable that these changes were instigated by the local community rather than by the Dean and Chapter of the New Foundation, who owned the properties from 1541. Existing property boundaries were consolidated by the erection of masonry walls (which also acted as revetment walls against the terracing), the same rents occur (although they were now increased) and the same families continued to occupy the houses (see p. 209). 13 The truncation of the levels under the Period Ill Building M2A (see p. 143) suggests that terracing also occurred earlier, but this was probably confined to the immediate building sites, prior to construction. 14 Mirrored by a similar ribbon development on the south side of the street opposite. Both sets of development are shown on maps dating to c. 1550 and c. 1640 (Maps 49 and 123, Cathedral Archive and Library Canterbury, see Fig. 8). 148 EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL Two properties on the St. Martin's Hill frontage (Buildings M2B and M3) were exposed (Fig. 9).15 M2B was a total re-build of the earlier structure M2A and occupied virtually the same position. Building M3 was an entirely new structure. Three structural phases (A, B and C) spanning the life of this building could be isolated. Many of these refurbishments were obviously required due to problems caused by the instability of the ground. From this period to the present day the general topography of the area has hardly altered. The site was divided into northern and southern segments, (possibly along the line of the Period II east/west track) the latter containing the houses and associated back gardens. The northern area remained as open ground, either fields or gardens (certainly gardens from the mid seventeenth century). By this time also the site was bounded on the east by the grounds of a large house (Christchurch House, later St. Martin's Priory). (b) TRENCH A (Fig. 9) Building M2B The position of the north and south masonry dwarf walls ( A 70, A 77) of a single room of Building M2B was located. 16 This timber-framed structure was virtually a re-build of Building M2A. The frontage wall (A77) was erected directly on top of the front wall (A77A) of the earlier building. The rear wall alignments were probably also identical. The building was certainly erected after the terracing of the site, although associated levels could not be directly related to this reduced horizon (A140A) to the rear because of an intervening Period V wall (see Fig. 17). The internal deposits, however, sealed and appeared to truncate the earlier Period III building levels. The deposits were in turn greatly disturbed and eventually completely removed to the north by subsequent post-medieval building activity. Wall (A77), which was composed of chalk lumps and flints in a 15 Although the presence of two properties was not completely proved by excavation, it is very likely considering the diverging alignments of the buildings and, more specifically, the different levels (c. 20.50 m. 0.D. for Building M2B and c. 21.50 m. O.D. for Building M3) from which they were constructed. For various reasons it was not feasible to excavate the junction of the two properties, situated between Trenches A and B. 16 The position of the west wall (shown on Fig. 9) is based on a possible later property boundary. 149 Sl Augusti.n e• s Abbey Cellarer's Garden St.Martin,s Church (inset). Grounds of 'Christchurch House' {􀀖\uSt.Uartifl'• Ptu:ityl I i i i I I i // I I Trenchc'll r7 M ! j TrenchC Ll mO no =.:;,::- 11 II II II I I I I // II // I I I I ,, II ,, I/ // ,, I I -J '- ---= - I III It ,, /J D , , ______ IS9A􀀗- 91/ I :- -----== : lll .ff/ I e"f:,I I , 01 / ,:I I :!!I I 􀀃,, ill Drain 262 ]---.::.::.:~-- !t ---::::: I ::::-_!f / 17 . --;;,------- t' • Horizon truncoted :1 r-----=== ---- .. gt I ---- • c:f f Wal 159 IS BUILDING M2B -81 I §'1 ... f'f, J, 􀀃: 4.,/, I ,, I I I1 I, I I I BUILDING M3 Period IV = :::::: :.::.: . .-:.-..::~-:-.,:--- Fig. 9. St. Martin's Hill 1984: Detail Plan of Trenches A and B: Period IV. A 􀀆 􀀇:j 0 z en lo- 􀀈 Ul􀀊 􀀉 a:: ►:-:, 􀀋 r.n ::x: 􀀌 s ):2. JONATHAN RADY chalky-white mortar, was rendered on its inside face and survived to a height of 10 cm. Prior to its construction the area adjacent to the earlier wall (A 77 A) was cut down (Al 75), presumably to expose and extract the original timber plate of Building M2A, which would have been buried in occupation deposits by this time. The construction disturbance A175 was filled with gravel and mortar (A174A, A174B) obviously related to the fabrication of the dwarf wall, and was sealed by a primary clay floor which abutted wall A77. The rear wall of the building (A 70) was identical to the front wall. This, too, was set in a shallow depression and had therefore partly survived later building activity, but it could not be related to any of the internal levels (Fig. 17). Clay floor A174 probably originally butted a tile-on-edge hearth (A110). The incomplete remains of this fireplace overlay the uppermost Building M2A levels, suggesting that it was an original feature of Building M2B. The floor was sealed by a thick deposit of very dark brown to black compact striated occupation silt (A108). This level abutted and ·also partially overlay hearth 110 where it became very ashy with thin carbon lenses. Layer A108 contained very few finds, apart from a coin of 1625-34 (S.F. no. 154), which may have been intrusive. Towards the north of the area this deposit was progressively truncated by later building activity. In the southern area of the trench, however, a wedge of levels post-dating Al08, but contemporary with the occupation of the building, survived. These deposits consisted of thin clay floors (A82, A78) separated by a lens of occupation silt (A79). The sequence was capped by floor levels relating to the Period V Building Pl. The nature of the floor levels mentioned above, especially the thick occupation silt A108, suggests that upon the erosion of the primary clay floor A174 a sequence of trodden earth surfaces, composed of occupation debris, gradually accumulated within the structure. This material was eventually overlaid by new clay floors. Numerous features relating to the occupation of Building M2B were also excavated. These included stake-holes and post-holes, most of which cut from the top of, or from within, the occupation Al08. Two other disturbances (A74, A83, Fig. 9) may have served some other function. Feature A83, which was truncated and sealed by Period V floor levels, cut clay floor A82 and must have been inserted late in the life of Building M2B. 152 mO II 0 EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL Period IV BUILDING M3 Phase C 15 Fig. 10. St. Martin's Hill 1984: Detail Plan of Trench B: Period IV. Building M2B: Dating summary Although very little artefactual evidence for the date of erection of Building M2B was recovered, its probable contemporaneity with Building M3 to the east (see below) suggests that it was built within, or shortly after, the period c.1500-c.1525. This date is not contradicted by the late fifteenth-century pottery found within the backfill of construction trench Al 75 and also corresponds with a sudden decrease in pit digging to the rear. Both Buildings M2B and M3 were superseded by post-medieval 153 -- ------------􀀕 - ------------- ---------- - - - ------------ -------- ---- s ___ _ mO ft 0 A --------- Period IV 0 D--- Q ---------- X 71:'J r,o O./"') / Hod,on f/£:.}/if!) '?/t},91 z(;:;·􀀈 ;·􀀉, I '-----l_ 426 o n I ----------- • '-V 0 I -✓ --.() ----- Period V 436 4090 􀀅---,-®- :􀀋ING􀀌,􀀍 .,(􀀎. -􀀏 (/ Jfl; ;' ,::,;•/ I Z 394 t􀀇􀀈t,f , / //;'f./ I I -.: 1r,G:>J I , • 1'?1-; 398 t/ ,:(.􀀍 / 1 • I•􀀊••/ I '---/4:•·, I I 383J'< 4250<,/ 15 -􀀔88 / /y 5 // // -,;;J<- , I I Fig. 11. St. Martin's Hill 1984: Detail Plans of Trench E: Periods IV and V. 154 y EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL (Period V) structures. However, the date of this re-building is difficult to establish due to the lack of evidence in the relevant construction levels. Pottery recovered from occupation layer A79 and Feature A83 must have been deposited late in the life of Building M2B and suggests that its demolition and the subsequent re-building occurred soon after 1625/50. The coin (S.F. no. 154) was probably intrusive in the disturbed occupation Al08, but was certainly Jost prior to the deposition of the floors of the Period V Building Pl. Whether it originated from later Building M2B occupation deposits or from Building Pl construction activity, it supplies a terminus post quern of 1625-34. Back Garden Area The earlier Period III rubbish-pits were truncated by a horizon (A140) probably related to the overall terracing of the area in c. 1500-25. A 20 cm. thick deposit of garden loam (A32) overlay this horizon. Apart from late fifteenth/early sixteenth-century pottery it yielded one sherd dating to c. 1575/1600. Three pits, probably also contemporary with the occupation of Building M2B, were found cutting the garden soil. Pit A40, which was completely excavated to a depth of 60 cm. contained a uniform fill of dark brown clayey loam. The fill yielded residual material and pot-sherds dating to 1575/1600-25. A complete, articulated skeleton of a horse or donkey was found lying in the base of this feature (Plate II). Two other pits (A31, A33) were also partially excavated. (c) TRENCH B Building M3: Phase A (Fig. 9, Plate III) Building M3 was probably contemporary with Building M2B described above. Two rooms along the road frontage and one to the rear (north room) were partially exposed. All the levels within the south-west room were destroyed by a later cellar. The east wall of this cellar probably underpinned the original internal wall between the south-west room and the frontage room to the east (south room). No trace of this partition survived. The timber-frame of Building M3 was supported by masonry dwarf walls (B159 and B217). These walls were erected on a reduced horizon B294 that probably related to the overall early sixteenthcentury terracing of the area. In the area of Building M3 this horizon 155 JONATHAN RADY truncated the earlier Period III clay quarry B310 and late fifteenth/ early sixteenth-century rubbish pits (Fig. 18). Wall B 159 was composed of flints in a creamy-brown, gritty, chalky mortar and was 10 in. ( c. 25 cm.) wide. The upper surface of the wall was levelled off with horizontal peg-tiles. Scars, showing the position and 7 in. ( c. 18 cm.) width of the original plate, as well as impressions of the grain of the timber, remained in the surviving upper surface. The depth of the wall uniformly varied from c. 24 cm. at the north to c. 0.50 m. at the south. Since the top of the wall would have been built level, this variation in depth presumably indicates the remaining slope of the hillside following the early sixteenth-century terracing. Towards the north of the trench Wall B159 was planed off and eventually completely removed by later buildings. Consequently, the northern limits of the building could not be precisely defined. A short length of longitudinal feature (B159A), preserved in a small segment of undisturbed stratigraphy in· the north-west corner of the trench may, however, have been a robber trench for the east-west return of Wall B159 (Fig. 18). Wall B217, which delineated the north side of the south room, was of similar build and bonded with Wall B159. The presence of a door leading from the south room to the outside of the building was suggested by the sudden termination of this wall 15 in. (c. 48 cm.) to the east of Wall B159. The width of the door could not be ascertained. No trace of the wall partitioning the rooms along the road frontage survived, but it was almost certainly all timber, with no masonry dwarf wall. The eastern end of the building may correlate with the east end of Building P2 (Period V) which still survives at the west end of no. 9 St. Martin's Hill (see Fig. 13). North Room The excavated levels suggest that the original floors of this room were eventually removed and replaced (Phase B). This was probably due in part to severe subsidence of the floors and walls into underlying features. The thorough nature of this renovation, and the fact that a contemporary drain (B262, see below) was laid under the new floors, may mean that flooding, possibly caused by emerging ground water or surface water from the hillside, was a factor. South Room This room contained a complex sequence of clay floors and other deposits, most of which survived later building activity because they had slumped into the Period III clay quarry B310 and pit B421. To 156 EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL the west all the layers were cut away by the construction of a post-medieval cellar. The earliest deposit, clay floor B418, overlay the truncated clay quarry (B310). A few stake-holes, found cutting the floor, may have represented some sort of internal fitting against the partition wall. This feature may have been inserted at a much later date, probably upon the blocking of the adjacent door to the north, since any structure in this position would have obstructed the entrance. The clay floor must have originally abutted a rectangular brick hearth (B242, Plate IV). The heavily burnt fireplace was constructed of one course of bricks bedded on a thin layer of yellow sand (B285) bordered by bricks laid on edge. The front of the hearth had subsided into pit B421 and had subsequently been renovated. Layers of gravel and re-deposited brickearth (B327, B326), which just over-lapped B418, abutted the hearth on the west and may have been the footings of an associated lath- and plaster-firestack, built again the partition wall. A 6 cm. deep post-hole (B268) adjacent to the corner of the hearth, probably held a post supporting the superstructure of the chimney stack. The primary deposits were overlain by a succession of thin and very worn clay floors (B293, B243) and an intervening occupation deposit (B297). Apart from a few residual sherds of medieval pottery no other datable material was recovered from any of the deposits mentioned above. Immediately in front of the fireplace the floors and occupation deposits had slumped into the underlying pit B421. Dumps of clay and re-patchings (B422) of the worn floors had been laid in this depression (Fig. 18). Immediately to the rear of the south room a small area of outer back courtyard (B261) survived. The courtyard overlaid the reduced horizon (B294) and abutted dwarf wall B159 (Fig. 18). Building M3: Phase B (Fig. 9) Probably soon after its erection Building M3 suffered structural problems due to the instability of the underlying ground. The southern end of wall B 159 and part of wall B217 ( and associated floor levels) slumped by nearly 30 cm. into the earlier clay quarry (B310). A line of unmortared bricks (B155) directly overlying part of wall B159 must have been inserted under the wall plate and was probably an attempt to underpin the timber-frame. North Room Severe subsidence into the earlier features and possible flooding required the removal and replacement of all the original floor levels 157 JONA THAN RADY in the north room. During this refurbishment the opportunity was taken to lay a drain across the room, prior to the deposition of a new floor. The primary deposit which abutted wall B159 was a very mixed layer of levelling dump (B270), composed of yellow, orange and grey clays and parts of re-deposited clay floors and occupation material. A tile drain (B262, Plate V) ran approximately east-west across the trench. The construction trench for the drain cut through the outer courtyard (B261) and also the dump layer (B270) in the north room; a hole had been cut through dwarf wall B159 so that the drain could be laid. The drain consisted of crudely-made interlocking semicircular ceramic segments, bedded in creamy mortar and capped with whole peg-tiles. Each segment was c. 40 cm. long, with an average diameter of 14 cm. and glazed on the inside. They were almost certainly made at Tyler Hill. Within the north room the drain and the dump deposits (B270) were sealed by a thick layer of re-deposited brickearth (B170), which acted as a clay floor. A thin spread of occupation silt (B246) overlay parts of the floor surface. Towards the north-east the deposits were progressively disturbed by post-medieval floor levels. Only two features, a stake-hole (B256) and a small pit or post-hole (B253), were contemporary with the occupation of floor (B170). South Room At some time during the life of Building M3 the doorway leading from the south room to the back courtyard area was blocked. This was represented by a 20 cm. thick mass of pale olive creamy mortar and flints (B217A), which abutted wall B217 on the east and which overlay the earlier clay floor (B293). Hearth B242 was refurbished (Plate IV); the front of the feature had slumped into the underlying pit (B421, Fig. 18, H-L). Attempts to consolidate the soft spot were made by laying a longitudinal raft of peg-tiles bonded with orange-brown clay (B313) in the depression. A line of bricks (B312; not shown in section) bedded and bonded with pale brown clay, was transversely laid along the tile raft to level the area prior to the deposition of a new hearth front (B242A). This was composed of two rows of bricks, bedded in a thin layer of buff brownish-yellow clay (B284f A new clay floor (B243) was then laid over the earlier levels. This surface abutted the original hearth and its refurbishment as weII as the blocking of the door (B217A). Problems with subsidence to the front of the hearth remained, however, since later patchings of yellow clay (B243B) were deposited in this position. This deposit, floor B243 158 EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL and the hearth itself were finally sealed by a very thin spread of black ash and carbon (B243A), presumably derived from the raking out of the fireplace. Building M3: Phase C (Fig. 10) Substantial alterations to Building M3 took place probably fairly late in its life. North Room A sprung timber floor was inserted into the north room. Beam slots (B257, B241, B173) representing timber joists for this floor ran east-west across the room and cut into the underlying clay floor (B170). They abutted wall B159 at right angles. A fireplace and chimney stack, facing south into the south-west room was inserted, probably contemporary with the laying of the sprung floor to the north. The brick foundations of the stack (B240) extended into the north room. The construction trench for these foundations cut through clay floor B170 and also entirely removed dwarf wall B159 along the front of the fireplace. The sub-foundation (B240A) consisted of a 30 cm. depth of large flints, cobbles and chalk lumps in a matrix of grey glutinous clay. Seven brick courses of the firestack, bonded with grey clay, survived above the sub-foundation. A portion of brick hearth (B168) within the fireplace also survived. The tile drain (B262) was certainly still in use at this time. The insertion of the firestack had disturbed the course of the drain, which was relaid in brick within the fireplace fabric. South Room The fireplace within the south room was eventually demolished and the hearth and latest clay floors buried beneath dumped clay deposits (B224). Two separate phases of new fireplace foundations (B157A, B157) were located against the north wall, in the position of the earlier blocked doorway. These consisted of super-imposed longitudinal pads of creamy mortar (Fig. 18, G-J). The earlier phase (B157A)' was abutted by dump B224, and three beam-slots for a sprung timber floor (B163A, B165, B167), which cut into the dump level. These were sealed by a secondary clay dump (B158), which abutted the later fireplace foundation. Another phase of beam-slots (B161, B162, B163, B164 and B167A), contemporary with the second fireplace, (B157), cut the dump level. Scars, evident in the upper surface of the second pad of mortar, indicated the original 159 JONA THAN RADY presence of large slabs of stone. The levels were immediately sealed by levels relating to a subsequent Period V fireplace of Building P2. Back Courtyard Area The courtyard to the rear of the property was eventually submerged under a 10 cm. thick deposit of dark grey-brown silty loam (B250). A feature (B263A), which cut through layer B250 down to the drain (B262), was almost certainly dug to expose the drain at this point. The disturbance of the peg-tile capping of the drain suggests that it was to give access to the drain possibly for the purpose of cleaning it out or removing a blockage. The Well (Plate VI) A well (2), situated a few metres east of Trench D, was partially excavated (Fig. 8). This feature bad remained open and only partly backfilled up to the beginning of the excavation in October 1984. The well was lined with an 8 in. (20 cm.) thickness of masonry, composed of flint and chalk in creamy mortar, rendered on the inside face, with an internal diameter of 3 ft. (0.91 m.). About 1.50 m. of the remaining backfill was excavated, but due to the incursion of large quantities of water upon the removal of parts of the lining, any further investigation was precluded. However, the well was almost certainly contemporary with Building M3 and situated within its back garden. It may have remained in use until the final demolition of the post-medieval buildings in c. 1790. Building M3: Dating summary The numerous features truncated by the overall terracing of the hillside and subsequently sealed by the construction of Building M3 provide a clear terminus post quem of 1475-1525 for these events. The considerable subsidence of the building and its internal levels strongly suggest that it was erected very soon after the final backfilling of the earlier features, possibly around 1500-25 or slightly later. Because of the paucity of recovered artefacts, the date of the ensuing structural and internal alterations is difficult or impossible to establish. Phase B, which mainly consisted of repairs to the building, probably commenced soon after its initial construction. Contemporary occupation of clay floor B170, however, probably occurred within the period c. 1575-c. 1625. Phase C may have commenced during or after the first quarter of the seventeenth century. A jeton 160 EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL (S.F. no. 215) from beam-slot Bl 73, supplies a terminus post quern of 1601-10, but this may relate to the removal of the sprung floor in the north room and not to the initial laying of the joists. The disposition of these joists to the back of the fireplace (B240) suggests that the floor and fireplace were contemporary. The chronology of the sequence of sprung floors and fireplace fronts within the south room is impossible to establish and they may even relate to the Period V Building P2 (see below p. 170). Building M3 was eventually re-built (Building P2), but the levels investigated in Trench B supplied little dating evidence. However, the almost certain contemporaneity of this re-building with the demolition and re-building of the adjacent structure M2B (see above p. 149) indicates that this probably occurred soon after 1625-50. ( d) TRENCHES C, D and E Few deposits or features of this period survived in the other trenches because of ensuing post-medieval terracing. A short length of a wall (D142A), aligned approximately eastwest, was exposed at the north end of Trench D. The wall, which survived to a height of c. 30 cm., was composed of flints, chalk lumps and peg-tile in a creamy-white mortar and was rendered on its southern face (Fig. 19, U-V, U 1-V1). The wall, which overlay the backfill of pit D377 (dated c. 1475-1500/25), was sealed by a later brick re-build (D142). No associated construction levels for the wall were evident, but on the south side the base of the wall appeared to coincide with a reduced horizon (D294). This horizon, which was almost certainly equivalent to Horizon B294 associated with the late fifteenth/early sixteenth-century overall terracing, overlay the natural subsoil and also truncated earlier Saxon pits and one (D395) dating to c. 1450-1475/1500. The contemporary ground surface to the north of wall D142A was destroyed by later post-medieval terracing but must have been at a higher level. This difference in levels across the wall and the rendering on the south face only suggest that it served both as a boundary wall and as a revetment or terrace wall. The badly disturbed foundations of a frontage wall (E438), parallel and adjacent to North Holmes Road, were excavated in Trench E (Fig. 11). The footings were similar in build to wall D142A and probably of the same date. The wall, which acted as a boundary separating the northern area of the 'Conduit Meadow' from North Holmes Road, was probably demolished when the northern part of the site was re-terraced and a tenement Building P4 (see Period V, p. 174) erected on this part of the road frontage in the mid seventeenth century. 161 JONATHAN RADY A few shallow pits and other garden features (E391, E392, E403, E404, E426) were also excavated. These features contained similar dark brown loamy fills, and cut layer E410, but were of indeterminate date.17 10. Period V c. 1625150-c. 1790 (Figs. 12, 13, 14) (a) SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION (Fig. 12) Around the middle of the seventeenth century further extensive landscaping of the 'Conduit Meadow' occurred particularly north of the east-west boundary wall. At the same time the late medieval structures (Buildings M2B and M3) on the road frontage were re-built, possibly because of general dilapidation, caused by structural and other problems dating back to the origin of the buildings in the early sixteenth century. It is possible that the whole range along the north side of the road was wholly or partially re-built at this time.18 This redevelopment may have occurred as late as the early 1660s, after the Commonwealth 'interregnum' when some of the properties were re-acquired by the Dean and Chapter. Two distinct structural phases of Building Pl were discerned; during the second of these at least the house was probably mostly of brick. Building P2 appears to have remained partially timber-framed and was mainly a re-construction of the earlier Building M3. The new buildings respected the earlier property divisions and to some extent the internal arrangement of the previous houses. Outhouses and tenements (Buildings P3 and P4) to the north were also possibly erected at this time. The northern area probably became gardens, which were extended into the areas occupied by Buildings P3 and P4 upon their demolition in the eighteenth century. From 1673 much of the 'Conduit Meadow' was owned by the City; the land was acquired to protect the city water supply, fed from a spring in the north-east corner of the meadow. The conduit from this spring was not located, probably because since c. 1790 the northern boundary of the meadow has moved to the south. This is indicated by maps of the area, particularly a Terrier map of 1792, which gives dimensions of the 17 They have been placed in this period because they were sealed by a Period V wall. on1 i one pit (E403) was of any great depth (c. 1.55 m.). Most of this range survives (see Plate VII and Fig. 16) but the extant buildings have not been studied in detail. In the cellar of no. 1 St. Martin's Hill, however, traces of a possible late medieval cellar are visible, and many of the other properties contain timber elements some of which may be late medieval in date. 162 no Period ·v· .· c.1625/50-c.1790 St. Martin's , - ,' ........ / , .,/' ,,, , / ,,' .,." ', ',,.... // ,/,/ S t/. M artin•s Church ,:_ .................. .... Gatlt ,,.,,.. /'·----------------- '"'•., ,, ... _ .. , •• ,1n ""·-·-·-- ·····---- •••••• • / ?Avern,e ,,.., "" .,,.,. ., , mo --------------·--•-- ---- +- " - - __ ·--- ---·- - ti' 􀀃 ?P•.i11on ol Clly <•••ell <•"<1•11 • """'" .... , . /1' I i,., ... ,,. ... 􀀈 . ! . 􀀈 􀀘-􀀙􀀚 I ! o· i ?. • I/ :7 ,• LOn4I_ .. In z :10 􀀋 --.. .... ; 􀀛1-,- ... ., , I i •-••••• i ,cl, _, . I ' ,,.􀀆 ' 􀀇 ....,...., 3 / :: ""¾- .."i;-;!'L"'"'-.,,,,=""""',;""'l'""="'􀀊=;r,,,,, ..=...::, ===-==.,,=-==1:; f j IT,onchD e ff • ow.t12 // 1/1 Out.house P3cm0 :1 ,, 􀀅f I , fd"""'"':1 by ,􀀉 cj I ----------111 - 􀀊 􀀋 '// -􀀅􀀆 􀀈 - Bui.ding Pl ;􀁀. :/ Cl) . 􀀊 '@?{;·,-·· ,·; 􀀉 . _,, .•.. _􀀐􀀑,, .,f. .. ,._ 􀀈:􀀉1r.;r: ,.._ ----------------- ------ 􀀂 C: 􀀂 a, 􀀃 E 8, >, 􀀃 .... tl) 􀀄 .,. i' L-- 􀀄- JONAT HAN RADY field.19 By c. 1790 the Burghmote-owned buildings on the site (Pl and P2) had been demolished. (b) TRENCH A Building PI: Phase A (Fig. 13) The Period IV Building M2B was replaced by a totally new building, PI, which approximately respected the position and alignment of the earlier structure. Prior to its erection the ground under and immediately to the rear of the building was levelled, truncating the earlier Period N deposits. Only the rear wall (A22) of Building PI was located, just to the north of the rear dwarf wall of Building M2B. However, subsequent structural modifications during Phase B suggest that the entire fabric of this wall may have belonged to this later phase (see p. 166). During Phase A the rear of the structure may have been a timber outshot. Virtually only the foundation of wall A22 (Fig. 17, B-C) remained. This foundation was trench-built and survived to a maximum height of 65 cm. It was composed of bricks, flints and re-used Caen and sandstone blocks, some worked, in a matrix of light yellow mortar. Only a portion of one room of Building PI was examined. The earliest deposits consisted of irregular spreads of dumped material (A64, A66, A73, A76, A80/81), which partially sealed the Period IV dwarf wall A 70 and associated deposits and were laid on an irregular disturbed horizon. The exact derivation of these levels is unclear, but they may represent levelling, infilling disturbances caused by the demolition of Building M2B, or are possibly connected with the construction of Building Pl. A large, 25 cm. deep, post-hole (A55), which cut the dump deposits, may have been related to the construction. These contexts were sealed by floor levels of Building PI and the base of a free-standing firestack (A53). The fireplace was aligned parallel to the rear wall and about 1.60 m. south of it. Only the very base of the foundation of the firestack (A53) survived, to a maximum height of 5 cm. since it was later demolished and · floored over (Phase B). These footings were composed of horizontal peg-tiles, some complete, bonded with yellow mortar and laid on a thin levelling raft of orange-brown clay. •Y In the Cathedral Archive and Library Canterbury and reproduced in Fig. 15 (inset). 164 mO ftO Phase A 15 􀀋=.::::::.:-==-:::--il 7 ,, OUTHOUSE? ff ,, ,. :: ff Period V 153 OUTSHor? I F..... o plac􀀌 151 I c::::::::----____ - Fig. 13. St. Martin's Hill 1984: Detail Plan of Trenches A and B: Period V. I I I I I I I ,: : I I 􀀣D ✓✓'· l«>d pip• 1 It _ 107 ., 234 9 ______ 􀀤􀀥--- I r------ I/ Wall 154 , -., ___ ::::-------1, 236 I -----, I Soakaway? / / II II // I I ,I,I ~-:.:------::-}/ ,, =? \re,􀀚c:1Si5l ) I 1.. _________ 1r·------,------------------ 1'I' 􀀑 􀀒 F1tlla .·"! •. ·􀀕. ·.: ... - -·••:·--·.,.··:: .---􀀏.... •·-· , I I I I I I I I I I 􀀅· I I I ... I 2 I I I I TRENCH e I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SAXON TRACK I I I I PIT 432 PIT 419 Ipswich - type Copper alloy No. 8 1 Ipswich - type ;;:. rn-· · : 􀀑 -1􀀒·.'li, . · ' 􀁣 _J. ·:· -t􀀉,, ST. AUGUSTINE'$ ABBEY 198◄ PIT 122 A•lhtlbtrht 11 􀀠nnv, tpawic.h - typo war■ c. aoo/a2s - a10 Fig. 20. St. Martin's Hill 1984: Period I: Mid to late Saxon Pottery (Scale: ¼; inset, scale: 1/16). 􀀄 a ,.,_g 􀀁 '"9 n .. - - - - - ------- 􀀅 '􀀂 ,,,,, 8 JONATHAN RADY The sandy ware (MLS 2) is present in all the pottery-bearing contexts indicated- except E419- and is represented by nos. 1, 4-8. Pit A274 also contained a rim with form and finish very similar to no. 7 (?same vessel). All are hand-made with generally, curving everted rims regularly pinched into shape - the exception is the thickened near-upright rim of 4. All except 5 have been roughly knife-trimmed/scraped externally; no. 6 has been lightly knifed internally. On 6, again, the sharp vertical knife facets have been softened beneath a final moderate external burnish. Both knifing and subsequent burnish are crude on the interesting little pot no. 4. Only 5 is unknifed - but has a patchy external burnish. This piece, and 6, are sooted externally. The most important sherd is no. 1, originally from a large jar decorated with repousse bosses, highlighted by patchy burnishing. The bosses are shallow, pushed out with a stick/bone-end, the resulting bumps slightly flattened, probably during burnishing. Shelly (MLS 4) wares are present in pits E396 and B423 - representing three individuals. The only drawable item is no. 3 from E396, which, together with a number of fragmentary body sherds from the same pot, is worn, and abraded with heavy leaching of shell-content. Ipswich-type wares. Ten sherds were recorded, four from in situ Period I contexts. Their overall distribution on a site this size is meaningless, but they were found in most trenches, with a marked bias in Trench E. From Period I features: a worn base (no. 3) was the sole content of Pit E419; two joining sherds with slight edge-wear occurred with coarse wares 6-7; a single little-worn sherd accompanied nos. 1-2, and a further edge-burred intermediate fine/'pimply' sherd was associated with MLS 2 scraps and the strap-end (refigured) from Pit E432. The bulk of these sherds is of the fi􀁺e/or finely sanded variant - (including residual pieces) representing nine to ten vessels. A further residual sherd, in a fine fabric similar to the finer Ipswich-types has a black, moderately burnished exterior, and may prove to be East Anglian, copying imported Continental products. Discussion The small collection of coarse wares and imported Ipswich-types is a welcome addition to the sparsely represented mid-late Saxon pottery from Canterbury. The equally welcome conjunction in Pit E432 of local sandy ware and Ipswich-type intermediate sherds with the copper alloy strap-end, from the same basic Period I level as the illustrated coarse wares, is sufficient confirmation of the latter's estimated ninth-century date. More specifically, with what is already 180 EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL known of Canterbury's late Saxon products, the present material is unlikely to be later than c. 850-875. In isolation, however interesting or significant (i.e. the quantities of Ipswich-type ware), the Period I finds are not spectacular. What does make them special are the scrappy little pieces from Pit E396: the boss-decorated no. 1, the shelly no. 2 and the accompanying Ipswich-type sherd. This three-fold combination was first noted from a central Canterbury site (Marlowe III, Pit 160) and tentatively dated c. 775-825/50,24 and again more recently in St. Augustine's Abbey (1984) Pit 122, this time associated with a worn coin of Aethelberht II of Wessex and Kent - a penny minted until c. 862, with a maximum loss range of c. 858-870. Even more recently, from Christ Church College, the same wares occur together with the same formal and decorational traits in a further pit group. It is now safe to say that these wares form a generally consistent combination in a consistent trend, and that local sandy boss-decorated jars, in particular, are a type-fossil for the mid-late Saxon period in Canterbury. A full discussion and visual presentation of the formal inter-relationships between these groups is not possible here, but the presence of the coin-associated St. Augustine's Abbey pit does enable some refinement in dating the present material. The interim assessment for St. Augustine's Pit 122 (Fig. 20, inset) was c. 800/825-870. The terminal date was supplied by the latest likely loss for the Aethelberht penny. The coin appears to be a late deposit in this pit, together with a small quantity of late Saxon sandy ware sherds (hatched over in Fig. 20). The formal and finishing aspects of the latter suggested a date early in this tradition's production range, i.e. almost certainly not after c. 900 and with a preference centred on c. 850-875. Though largely restorable, the bulk of the coarse wares from this pit, nos. 5-8 (and the shelly no. 4) was extremely fragmentary and edge-damaged, suggesting that they were already residual when dumped in Pit 122, or that the pit remained open for a considerable period after their deposition. A significant quantity of time had, therefore, to be accounted for in dating the whole of the pit's contents. A necessity reinforced by the position of the coin - high, in a late probably stabilizing fill. Whilst the presence of the penny dictated a c. 870 terminal for the main pottery elements, it was strongly felt that their actual production, and possibly loss, should be confined within the first half of the ninth century. The seemingly insignificant little collection from St. Martin's Hill Pit E396, is a crucial link to St. Augustine's (122), a link strengthened by nos. 6-7 from the present Pit C368, which though differing slightly in form, are essentially identical in fabric, manufacture, subsequent knifing and burnishing to no. 7 from Pit 122. Far too little is known of the full range of mid-late Saxon local coarse ware forms to speculate 181 JONATHAN RADY in depth on the chronological relationships between these groups, but the more truly everted rims of C368 nos. 6-7 could place them nearer to late Saxon tendencies. For the time being then, it is felt that the bulk of the Period I material can be safely placed between c. 800-850/875, with some elements - in particular those from Pit C368 - coming nearer to mid-century. Firmer dating should be possible with further work on the antecedents of the boss-decorated wares, for which Continental origins are suggested. Whatever the source the stimulus must have been strong for such an apparently dominant trait to have taken root. In addition, an understanding of the effects upon trade with East Anglia caused by the Viking raids into Kent from the 830s will enhance the potential represented by the Ipswich-type wares from Canterbury. Period III - c. 1400/25 - c. 1500/25 Considerable quantities of late medieval fifteenth- and early sixteenth-century local coarse wares were recovered from Period III contexts, in particular three large key groups from Pits A276, A286 and Gully B325. Initial dating of the first two gave a joint date bracket of c. 1475-1500/25, and for the gully c. 1425-1450/75. Ceramically the most important aspect of these and smal1er Period III assemblages from the site is that they confirm and amplify local fabric and formal trends from the Marlowe I 1978 excavation, where similar late fifteenth to early sixteenth-century stoneware-dated groups showed that the long-lived Canterbury sandy ware tradition was being replaced by fine earthenwares during the later or late fifteenth century. The subsequent and independent dating evidence extracted from documentary sources by Mrs. Sparks (below, p. 209) is extremely fortunate, supplying a degree of confidence and stability to the dating of the Periods III-IV sequence and to late medieval City groups in general. III. 1HE SMALL FINDS Pan Garrard with contributions from Ian Anderson, Marion M. Archibald and James Graham-Campbell The objects published here are a selection of the total assemblage. A full archive report covering all finds from St. Martin's Hill, is housed at 92A Broad Street, Canterbury. Each entry in this published report 182 - EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL is followed by its small find number, context number (in brackets) and period (in Roman numerals). The Coins I. Anderson A total of thirty coins and tokens was recovered, all but one (a Roman coin of Constans - A.D. 330-35) being of post-medieval date. Six are considered worthy of mention here, together with a coin weight. 1. William and Mary. ¼d. 1694. 2nd V of GVLIELMVS over M. Not listed in Peck. 33 (7) VI Demolition rubble, Trench A. Not illustrated. 2. Token. Hampshire. Late eighteenth century. Obv.: of D. & H. (Hants) 54, edge illegible. Hollowed reverse side refilled with pewter. 6 (1) VI Modern terracing, Trench A. Not illustrated. 3. Token. Hampshire. 1795. Rev.: of D. & H. (Hants) 57b. Edge: CURRENT EVERYWHERE. Hollowed obverse side refilled with pewter. 7 (1) VI Modern terracing, Trench A. Not illustrated. Nos. 2 and 3 were probably intended as companion pieces for display, to show both sides of an eighteenth-century token. 4. Lead cast uniface token. Cross with central pellet, one pellet in one of the angles; arms of cross enclosed within circle. 190 (184) V Layer, Trench A. 5. Lead cast uniface token. Cross with central pellet, and a pellet in each angle at the edge. Diameter: 14 mm. 185 (184) V Layer, Trench A. Not illustrated. 6. Lead cast uniface token. Thick cross composed of several parallel lines. ?Seventeenth cen􀁴ury.24A 49 (12) V Layer, Trench A. Not illustrated. The Coin Weight 7. Low Countries. Coin weight for an English angel, 1605-19. 173 (147) VI Floor, Trench B. Not illustrated. 24A M. Dean, 'Lead Tokens from the River Thames at Windsor and Wallingford', Numismatic Chronicle, 7 ser., 17, 137-47, Plates 8-12. 183 JONATHAN RADY Objects of Copper Alloy P. Garrard with a contribution from James Graham-Campbell 8. Mr James Graham-Campbell writes: 'Strap-end of copper alloy with niello inlay (Fig. 21), its somewhat battered and corroded condition obscuring a few details of the ornament. It terminates in an animal's head in slight relief, seen from above, with prominent snout, drilled eyes, and oval ears containing a pair of incisions of which the outer is lunate in form. The split end has two rivet-holes with a fan-shaped field between them, containing a bud-like motif. The main body is ornamented with a single field containing a backward-looking animal, within a plain border. Its head has open jaws, a bump over a circular eye, and a well-defined ear; the forequarters are massive in comparison with the weak front leg, lying beneath its roughly hatched body which tapers slightly to well-defined hindquarters. The hind leg degenerates into crude· interlace, with possible vegetal features, but in this area the design is now obscure, although most probably it was never clearly executed. Th.e reverse is plain. Length: 44 mm. 354 ( 432) I Pit, Trench C. This strap-end was found in a pit together with a small quantity of typical mid-late Saxon pottery now dated to c. 825- 875/900 (see p. 182) which is entirely consistent with the date to be attributed to this typical piece of ninth-century ornamental metalwork, decorated in the Trewhiddle style of Anglo-Saxon art.25 It is the first such strap-end known from Canterbury, but there are five others on record from Kent; those from St. Mildred's Bay, Thanet, and Stowting/Faversham,26 and that from Dymchurch27 are more elaborate in their design, each having four fields of ornament on the main body, whereas those from 25 D.M. Wilson, Anglo-Saxon Ornamental Metalwork, 700-1100, in the British Museum, (London, 1964). 26 J. Graham-Campbell, 'Some new and neglected Finds of ninth-century AngloSaxon ornamental Metalwork', Med. Arch., xxvi (1982), 144-51, and J. GrahamCampbell, 'Three Pieces of ninth-century Anglo-Saxon ornamental Metalwork in the Ro􀁛al Museum, Canterbury', Arch. Cant., xcix (1983), 21-4. 2 Wi.lson, Anglo-Saxon Metalwork, Fig. 1. 184 • EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL 8 Fig. 21. St. Martin's Hill 1984: Period I: Ninth-century Strap-end (Scale: 2:1); Reconstruction: Black - probable niello. Postling28 and Richboroughw have the one field containing a single animal in the manner of this example. All five strap-ends share a common feature in the form of their animal-head terminals which are given oval ears with lunate incisions- a common enough feature at this date 3 but one that is nevertheless not found on all such strap-ends. 0 In the main field, the posture of the backward-looking St. Martin's 28 V.I. Evison, 'A ninth-century Strap-end from Pestling', Arch. Cant., lxxxii (1967), 282-3. 29 C. Roach Smith, The Antiquities of Richborough, Reculver and Lympne, (London 1850), Pl. 5, 4. The strap-end from Lullingstone listed by Wilson (see note 25 above, 108) has since been shown by Evison (V.I. Evison, 'A bronze Mount from the Roman Villa at Lultingstone, Kent', Antiq lour, xlvi (1966), 85-7) to be a casket-mount. 30 Graham-Campbell 1982, see note 26 above, 149. 185 JONA1HAN RADY Hill animal, with both legs bent beneath the body, is more closely matched on a strap-end from Souldern, Oxon.,31 than on these Kentish examples, although the slashing of its body is also a feature of the more crudely executed piece from Postling. It must be admitted, however, that the design of the St. Martin's Hill example is likewise not of the highest order, with its poorly shaped limbs· and indeterminate interlacings.' 9. Thimble of thick copper alloy sheet. The pits are large forming a spiral pattern. The edge is folded over and flattened. 210 (229) III Clay floor, Trench A. 10. Thimble of thick copper alloy sheet, roughly cut at lower edge. The dome has a square flattened knob. The pits are very small, irregular, and form a spiral pattern. rost-medieval. 201 (145) V Demolition rubble, Trench D. 11. Thimble of thin copper alloy sheet; the dome is smooth and silvered. The pits are machine-made, but not well made. There are four fine rows of pecked decoration. 20 mm. high. Eighteenth century. 142 (41) VI Layer, Trench B. Not illustrated. 12. Needle with oval eye and lower part of the stem of triangular section forming cutting edges. Length: 78 mm. Complete. Post-medieval. 234 (140A) IV Terracing, Trench A. Not illustrated. 13. Rumble bell, broken; made from two hemispheres of copper alloy sheet and once soldered together to contain an iron pea. Diameter: 22 mm. Medieval to post-medieval. 235 (140A) IV Terracing, Trench A. Not illustrated. 14. Four broken studs made from copper alloy sheet wound into a cylinder with the end beaten over flat to form a roughly lozenge-shaped head; each has been painted with black paint used in the late medieval period on copper alloy objects. Diameter of heads: c. 17 mm. 223,224,226 and 227 (250) IV Layer, Trench B. Not illustrated. 15. Shoe buckle with two pronged tongue.32 Post-medieval. 139 (36) VI Topsoil, Trench B. 16. Button with turned down edge and engraved decoration; the under part is silvered, perhaps an indication that it was once completely silvered. 152 (41) VI Layer, Trench B. 31 D .A. Hinton, Catalogue of the Anglo-Saxon ornamental Metalwork 700-1100, in the Department of Antiquilies, Ashmolean Museum, (Oxford, 1974), no. 31. 32 I. Noel Hume, A Guide to Artifacts of Colonial America, (New York, 1980), 85, Fig. 20.12. 186 EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL .!!;:;:: : ;(65---􀀆 16 17 18 I I // ", '◊.. •- · .J. .t;, ,;.... • '. ,o 15 Fig. 22. St. Martin's Hill 1984: Metal objects: Lead (no. 4) and Copper Alloy (Scale: 1:1). 187 4 JONATHAN RADY r 􀀆19 23 21 Fig. 23. St. Martin's Hill 1984: Objects of Copper Alloy (Scale: 1:1). 17. Button. The base plate and loop were made separately in a mould (flashing around the loop base is detectable) and subsequently soldered to the globe of the button. Early eighteenth century. 123 (36) VI Topsoil, Trench B. 18. Fragment of decorative gilded shoe buckle. Post-medieval. 65 (16) VI Construction trench for no. 7 St. Martin's Hill, Trench A. 19. Large domed cast nail, the head is silvered. Wood adheres to the stem perhaps indicating it was used in a heavy piece of furniture. Post-medieval. 272 (149) VI Backfill of cellar, Trench B. 20. A pair of 'douters' or candle snuffers. Incomplete. Nineteenth century. 303 (378) VI Topsoil, Trench E. 21. Military button of the 3rd (King's Own) Dragoons, 1751-1818. Examples of this button exist made from pewter for Other Ranks and bone-backed for Officers. The method of manufacture of this button suggests that it is an original 289 (378) VI Topsoil, Trench E. 188 EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL 22. Military button bearing Royal Arms (with King's Crown) made by Wright and Son, Edgware, Middlesex. 1901-c. 1924. Worn on tunic by Other Ranks. 136 (36) VI Topsoil, Trench B. Not illustrated. 23. Small military button bearing Royal Arms (with King's Crown) made by W. Twigg and Co. Ltd., Birmingham. 1901-c. 1924. Probably a shoulder-strap button from Other Ranks tunic. 110 (36) VI Topsoil, Trench B. Nos. 21-23 were identified and described by Sue Latimer of Canterbury Museums. Objects of Iron P. Garrard (All the illustrations are made from X-rays.) Medieval 24. Socketed object with point. Length: 185 mm. 343 (396) I Pit, Trench E. Not illustrated. 25. Angle-backed knife. 365 ( 440) II Clay quarry pit, Trench E. 26. Object of D-section, ?with a bent tang; broken at the distal end. Decorated with inlaid bands of copper alloy. 295 (377) III Pit, Trench D. 27. Socketed arrow-head. The point is missing. Cf. LMMC 1975,33 Fig. 17, No. 15. Thirteenth century. 363 (410) III Layer, Trench E. Residual. 28. Blade of a pair of shears with cusped shoulder; the handle is twisted and broken. Blade length: 76 mm. Cf. LMMC 1975. Fig. 47, Type II. Thirteenth century. 94 (40) IV Pit, Trench A. Residual. Not illustrated. 29. Incomplete pair of small shears, with cusped shoulders, similar to no. 28 above. 189 (144) V Demolition rubble, Trench D. Residual. 30. Key. a. LMMC 1975, Fig. 42, Type IV. Thirteenth century. 271 (325) III Gully, Trench B. Residual. 31. D-shaped buckle, the tongue is broken. The x-ray suggests that it may be plated with another metal. 237 (276) III Pit, Trench A. 33 London Museum Medieval Catalogue, (London, 1975). 189 JONATHAN RADY 20 Fig. 24. St. Martin's Hill 1984: Object of Copper Alloy (Scale: 1:1). 32. Sixteen pointed spur-rowel. Diam: 67 mm. One point is broken. The x-ray suggests that the object may have been plated with another metal. 253 (291) III Pit, Trench A. 33. Whittle-tang knife. 374 (421) III Pit, Trench B. 34. Similar knife to no. 33 above, incomplete. 371 (311) III Pit, Trench A. Not illustrated. 190 EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL 35. Whittle-tang knife with curved blade, incomplete. Cf. LMMC 1975, Pl. XI, no. 6. 32 (7) VI Demolition rubble. Residual. 36. Whittle-tang knife. The blade is broken and is stamped with an inlaid cutler's mark. 208 (226A) 111 Pit, Trench D. 37. Scale-tang knife with three rivet holes for attaching handle plates, and copper alloy bolster. The blade is broken. 252 (291) 111 Pit, Trench A. 38. Handle of a similar knife to no. 37 above, with two rivets attaching bone plates. 258 (286) 111 Pit, Trench A. Not illustrated. 39. Scale-tang knife with bone plated handle. Inlaid cutler's mark on the blade. 80 (32) IV Garden soil, Trench A. 40. L-shaped hinge. 80 x 65 mm. Cf. The Archaeology of Canterbury,34 Vol. V, Part 11. 39 (7) VI Demolition rubble, Trench A. Residual. Not illustrated. Post-medieval 41. Rowel-spur, incomplete. The neck to the rowel box has encircling grooves. 88 (40) IV Pit, Trench A. 42. Rowel-spur similar to no. 41 above, with the neck grooves. 193 (150) V Cellar wall, Trench B. Not illustrated. 43. Scale-tang knife handle with bone plates attached by three iron rivets. There are two small copper alloy rivets alternating with the iron ones, perhaps for decoration. The blade is missing. 273 (219) V Layer in out-house, Trench D. Not illustrated. 44. Round-tang knife with leaf-shaped blade. 351 (378) VI Topsoil, Trench E. 45. Shoe buckle with two pronged tongue similar to no. 15 above. 145 (41) VI Layer, Trench B. Not illustrated. 46. Two parts of the same pair of scissors. The necks below the ring handles are elaborately moulded. 121 (68) 111 Stake-hole, Trench A. Intrusive. 206 (149) VI Cellar backfill, Trench B. 34 K. Blockley, P. Blockley, M. Day and S.S. Frere, 'Excavations in the Marlowe Car Park and Associated Areas', The Archaeology of Canterbury, Vol. V, forthcoming. 191 1111m, - - JONATHAN RADY , 30 0 u., 32. 􀀊--􀀋- I 􀀄--2- --'2-· 1 􀀆: 􀀇, r I \.􀀞 (--0 _0 . «=_ _=2 . fti 37 I' §..}􀀉i-;:Sg ___ ---0,-.;.􀀟 ] I ---------- i 39 􀀃 11 38 􀀃 Fig. 25. St. Martin's HilJ 1984: Objects of Iron (Scale: l). 192 c H 􀀇I' II􀀈 U JC? 26 I - - 0 EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL I I 0 Fig. 26. St. Martin's Hill 1984: Objects of Iron (Scale: ½). Objects of White Metal P. Garrard Post-medieval 47. Cast spoon with incomplete handle of D-section. The join between the handle and the back of the spoon is scale-shaped. Eighteenth century. 107 (36) VI Topsoil, Trench B. 48. Fragments of a cast buckle frame. 148 (111) VI Demolition rubble, Trench B. 49. Part of a poorly-cast buckle frame. The double-pronged iron tongue was apparently set into the warm metal. 42 (7A) VI Demolition rubble, Trench A. 50. Buckle frame fragment. 45 (7 A) VI Demolition rubble, Trench A. 193 -@ -- 46 44 JONATHAN RADY J I I I I I I I ' _____ _ ,.,. I , ' ... _____ ... I I I ''-') I I ! I 48 47 Fig. 27. St. Martin's Hill 1984: Objects of White Metal (Scale: 1:1). Objects of Antler and Bone P. Garrard 51. Piece of a connecting-plate, of D-section, for a double-sided composite comb made from antler. A break occurs across the hole made by an iron rivet used in the manufacture of the comb. 337 (397) I Pit, Trench E. 194 I I I EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL 52. Handle and end tooth-plate of a broken whip-handled, singlesided comb made from antler tine. Concentric grooves in two bands decorate the handle, together with notches on the remaining portion of the end containing the slots for the missing tooth plates. Only the stumps of the teeth remain on the surviving end tooth-plate, six to 10 mm. At the inner edge an iron stained rivet hole shows that the plate was attached with an adjacent plate to a back connecting-plate. 378 (368) I Pit, Trench C. 53. Possible pin-beater, highly polished and broken. The end is chipped and worn. Length: 115 mm., broken. 299 (374) III Clay quarry pit, Trench B. Not illustrated. 54. Well polished object with a sawn end and worn point. Possibly a pin-beater fragment. Length: 50 mm. 381 (368) I Pit, Trench C. Not illustrated. 55. Similar polished object, possibly a pin-beater. The end is broken and the point is chipped and worn. Surviving length: 50 mm. 388 (367) III Gully, Trench C. Not illustrated. 56. Well-made needle of oval section; the end is flattened and has a triangular groove through which an eye has been drilled. Length: 79 mm. 202 (219) V Levelling layer, Trench D. 57. Part of a simple H-type ivory comb. The coarse teeth number five to 10 mm. the fine teeth number eight to 10 mm. All are broken. 69 (26) V Garden soil, Trench A. Residual. Objects of Fired Clay P. Garrard 58. Fragment of well-fired bun-shaped loom-weight of typical Late Saxon type. 35 Not enough remains to discover the diameter of the size of the central hole. 334 (368) I Pit, Trench C. Not illustrated. 59. Pipe-clay wig curler, 65 mm long. Eighteenth century.36 17 (4) VI Topsoil, Trench A. 35 J. G. Hurst, 'Middle Saxon Pottery', Med. Arch., iii (1959), 23-6. 36 See note 32, 321-23. 195 JONATHAN RADY 49 50 Fig. 28. St. Martin's Hill 1984: Objects of White Metal (Scale: 1:1). 196 ,-·, ,_, I I I \ I I ' I I I (', I I ,w, 51 I I I !----::::: -_ ::_-_:;;;􀀒 I I I I "- - - - - - - -- - - 52 􀀁 Fig. 29. St. Martin's Hill 1984: Objects of Antler (Scale: 1:1). 197 ) i I I 54 57 JONA THAN RADY I. I. I,\ I • 55 - CD::t) 56 @ 59 Fig. 30. St. Martin's Hill 1984: Objects of Bone (Nos. 54-57) and Pipe Clay (no. 59) (Scale: 1:1). 198 -􀀂 J I EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL Objects of Stone P. Garrard 60. Two similar triangular pieces of mosaic tessera of lower greensand. 33 X 35 X 41 X 16 mm. and 35 X 29 X 25 X 13 mm. 373 (299) II ?Post-hole, Trench A. Not illustrated. 61. Broken, triangular shaped mosaic tessera of lower greensand. 60 x 56 x 70 mm. 384 (420) III Clay quarry pit, Trench B. Not illustrated. 62. Shaped, oval-sectioned stone, worn on the two flat faces. Imported fine micaceous sandstone. Incomplete. Approximately 40 mm. wide and 16 mm. thick. 91 (40) IV Pit, Trench A. Not illustrated. 63. Shaped honestone of Scandinavian mica schist. Deep groove in centre of upper face; slightly waisted from wear. 92 x 23 mm. wide x approx. 15 mm. thick. Medieval. 318 (149) VI Cellar backfill, Trench B. Residual. Not illustrated. APPENDIX I Two Pennies of Offa from Fordwich, Kent Marion M. Archibald 1. Offa of Mercia, 757-796. Penny, Group III, c. 792-6. Minted in East Anglia, moneyer LUL. Obv.: :·: M :,: 4 ◊ FF A/ [REX] Rev.: Moneyer's name in lobes of quatrefoil .L./U/[L] It is certain that this coin was struck in East Anglia because the moneyer Lui also worked for the East Anglian King Aethelberht, murdered on Offa's orders in 794 and also for Eadwald; the king of the native dynasty of East Anglia who ruled briefly between Offa's death and the reimposition of Mercian supremacy by Coenwulf a year or two later. Lui then went on to produce coins for Coenwulf. 2. Offa of Mercia, 757-796. Penny, Group III, c. 792-6. Minted a1 ?CanterburY. by the moneyer Ethelnoth. Obv.: :.Y :. I+◊ FF􀁮 1/11·: R E[Y·:]/ Rev.: Moneyer's name in lunettes on two in EpEL/NOp Wt.: 1.30 g. (fragment). 199 JONA THAN RADY Ref.: Same reverse die as BMC 49 but from a different obverse die. Coins of Group III were on a higher weight-standard than Offa's earlier issues and were introduced following an increase in the weight of the Carolingian coinage by Charlemagne about this time. The English coins were not so heavy, however, as their French counterparts. IV. THE HISTORY OF THE VILLE OF ST. MARTIN'S, CANTERBURY Margaret Sparks and Tim Tatton-Brown On the east side of Canterbury, nearly half a mile from the City wall, is a small settlement of houses which line the steep hill on the main road to Sandwich. Just to the north of these houses is the very famous church of St. Martin, which clearly acted as the nucleus of the settlement. Bede, in his Ecclesiastical History (I, 26), tells us that 'On the east side of the city stood an old church, built in honour of St. Martin during the Roman occupation of Britain, where the Christian queen of whom I have spoken [i.e. Bertha] went to pray. Here they [i.e. St. Augustine and his followers] first assembled to sing the psalms, to pray, to say Mass, to preach and to baptise, until the king's own conversion to the. Faith gave them greater freedom to preach and to build and restore churches everywhere. '37 This implies that the core of the present church, that is the western part of the chancel, may be a late Roman building; but Dr Harold Taylor has suggested that it is 'probably of sub-Roman or early Anglo-Saxon rather than Roman construction. '38 This would certainly have to be the case, if it was originally built as a chapel 'in honour of St. Martin' as St. Martin died in A.D. 397 and his cult would have taken a few years at least to reach Britain. Two other theories, however, have been advanced for the origin of the building. First that it may have been a cella memoria in a late Roman (Christian) cemetery beside the Roman road leading out of the City on the east to Richborough, and second, that the core of the building may have been part of an extra-mural Roman villa. The first theory, put 37 Bede, A History of the English Church and People, trans. L. Sherley-Price, (Penguin Classics 1955), 70-1. 38 H.M. and J. Taylor, Anglo-Saxon Architecture (1965), I, 143. 200 EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL forward particularly by Professor Jocelyn Toynbee39 can now be shown to be very unlikely as Dr Frank Jenkins has pointed out40 and as is clearly confirmed by the present excavations, as there is no evidence at all for a late Roman cemetery around the church. The possibility that the earliest parts of the church (both the western part of the chancel and the southern 'porticus') were originally parts of a late Roman villa (Fig. 2), and even that the earliest chapel of St. Martin was a 'house chapel', as in the now very well known Lullingstone villa, must be looked at again, though definite conclusions cannot be reached until further excavations are carried out in or around the church. 41 On present evidence, however, this last theory is perhaps .the most attractive. Moving now to the late sixth century, i.e. the period after the arrival of Bertha in Kent as Aethelberht's new Frankish queen, we have not only Bede's evidence, but also the quite remarkable find of the so-called St. Martin's hoard, discovered somewhere in the churchyard before 1845.42 This was in fact a necklace (all the coins were pierced) and can only have come from a late sixth-century burial. Together these suggest that St. Martin's Church was not just an isolated chapel where Bertha, with her chaplain Liudard, went occasionally to pray, but an important site on the east side of the City that may well have been within one of King Aethelberht's many 'royal vills'. The evidence for the trading wic (see below) would also perhaps suggest this. If the postulated old Roman villa site was also within a larger Kentish royal vill complex, this would perhaps explain why there was an important burial there (with the St. Martin's hoard necklace) and also perhaps why the new Abbey of SS. Peter and Paul (later St. Augustine's) with its seventh-century royal and archiepiscopal tombs, was situated just below St. Martin's Church in the area closer to, but still outside, the Roman city walls. In the seventh century there is the first clear evidence that the area north-east of the Roman city walls, bordering the River Stour, was a trading wic. These wic sites, 􀁩3 which are now being studied in greater 39 JBAA, xvi (1953), lff. 4° F. Jenkins, 'St. Martin's Church at Canterbury: a Survey of the earliest structural Fe4a1t ures', Med. Arch., ix (1965), 11-15. It should also be noted that Canon Routledge in his The History of St. Martin's Church, Canterbury (1891), 127, records that a Roman tessellated pavement was dis4c2o vered 'about 200 years ago in an adjacent part of St. Martin's Hill'. P. Grierson, 'The Canterbury (St. Martin's) Hoard of Frankish and Anglo-Saxon Coin-ornaments', British Numismatic Journal, xxvii (1952-4), 39-51. 43 See S. Reynolds, An Introduction to the History of English Medieval Towns (1977), 24-7. 201 JONATIIAN RADY detail at many locations on the North Sea and English Channel littorals, are very often found beside major rivers that connect directly with the open sea. They are also frequently not far away from late Roman fortified sites and the most famous of these wics are Hamwic (near Southampton),44 Sandwich (near Richborough),45 Lundenwic (the Aldwych/Strand area to the west of the City),46 Ipswich, Norwich, Dunwich, Eoforwic (just outside the Roman fortress at York),47 and perhaps Wigford (the southern suburb of Lincoln). In east Kent there appear to have been at least three major wics, Canterbury/Fordwich, Sandwich and the wic immediately south-west of the Saxon shore fort at Dover,48 and it is possible that they originated as trading settlements in the time of King Aethelberht in the late sixth century.49 Our first detailed evidence of how they were administered does not, however, come until the late seventh century in the time of the Kentish King Hlothere, whose law code first mentions the wic-gerefa, i.e. the reeve of the trading settlement. This strongly implies that the wics were under royal control. It is also in Hlothere's time that a charter of A.D. 67550 first mentions Fordwich. In order to consider the topography of the area north-east of Canterbury (Fig. 2, inset), it is first necessary to observe how the large area between the Stour and the main road to Sandwich was divided up in the late Anglo-Saxon period. There were four main units: the Archbishop's manor of St. Martin's, later called Caldecote; his settlement at Wic, later the Moat;51 the manor of Northgate or Colton, later given to Christ Church Priory by Lanfranc; and the town and port of Fordwich. Fordwich was a separate hundred and liberty, but the other units were geographically within the hundred 44 P. Holdsworth, 'Saxon Southampton', in {Eds.) J. Haslam, Anglo-Saxon Towns in Southem England (1984), 335-7. 45 T. Tatton-Brown, 'The Towns of Kent', in (Ed.) J. Haslam, ibid., 16-21. 46 T. Tatton-Brown, 'The Topography of Anglo-Saxon London', Antiquity, Ix 􀁲March 1986), no. 228. 4 Very recent work (1985) near the junction of the Rivers Ouse and Foss outside the Roman walls on the south-east seems to have found the wic site. 48 The area along the foreshore, south-west of the town was called 'Wyke' until the sixteenth century. It is now the Western Docks. 49 It was also Aethelberht, who as 'Bretwalda' ruled all the land south of the Humber, and who may have founded Lundenwic and many of the other east coast trasdoi ng settlements. (Ed.) P.H. Sawyer, Anglo-Saxon Charters, (1968), no. 7. 51 First mentioned in Domesday Monachorum as a yoke and clearly the eastern third of the later parish, see (Ed.) M. Sparks, The Parish of St. Martin and St. Paul, Canterbury (1980), 21-2. 202 EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL and liberty of Canterbury, although St. Martin's and Wic were attached to the archbishop's extra-mural hundred of Westgate. On the north-east, both Fordwich and Wic were later cut into by Odo of Bayeux's park (created c. 1075/6).52 It is likely that somewhat earlier Fordwich itself was cut out of the liberty and hundred (later the County Borough) of Canterbury,53 which certainly extended on the east as far as the Lam pen stream by the time of Domesday. 54 In the whole area north-east of Canterbury there was, therefore, a series of small settlements between the old Roman roads and the nucleus of the 'Jittle burgh' of Fordwich. The biggest of these were the groups of burgesses living beside the Roman roads outside Northgate (in Christ Church Priory's manor of Colton) and outside Burgate (in St. Augustine's manor of Longport and the archbishop's manors of St. Martin's/Caldecote and Wic). These were connected with the seaport at Fordwich, not by the Roman road from Northgate to Sturry, which required crossing marshy ground and at least two fords, but by the two ancient tracks that ran north-east from the main road to Sandwich. Of these two tracks, that on the east which forms the boundary of the later Wic manor, is still in use as a modern road which runs along the ridge-top and through Odo's park to Stodmarsh, with a steep lane descending to Fordwich. The track on the west, which is today only a public footpath to Fordwich, has been shown by excavation at its south end (see above) to be a major metalled road originating probably in the middle Anglo-Saxon period (just possibly even in the Roman period). This route is the only direct dry-shod route from Canterbury to Fordwich and it is possible that it was the axis of the large trading settlement, the wic of the pre-Viking era. So far archaeological evidence for this early settlement only comes from three sites, the present site and the Outer Court site at St. Augustine's Abbey55 and a site about half a mile south of Fordwich church where two silver pennies of Offa (c. 792-6) were found in 52 T. Tatton-Brown, 'Recent Fieldwork around Canterbury', Arch. Cant., xcix (1983), 115-19. 53 Fordwich was perhaps first separated from Canterbury and made a parvus burgus (Domesday's phrase) in its own right in 1055 when Edward the Confessor granted all his lands in Fordwich to St. Augustine's; Anglo-Saxon Charters, no. 1092. 54 Domesday Book also confirms this by saying the king has all the fines on the main roads (rectis callibus) outside the City, except where the land on both sides belongs to the Archbishop (i.e. outside Westgate) as far as! league 3 perches and 3 feet. This is about 1½ miles and the distance from the Burgate to the Lampen Stream at Fishpool Bottom. 55 See P. Bennett, 'Rescue Excavations in the Outer Court of St. Augustine's Abbey, 1983-84', Arch. Cant., ciii (1986), 79-117. 203 JONA1HAN RADY 1985.56 The first two sites mentioned have produced imported pottery of the middle Saxon period, and it is very unlikely that this was just from isolated settlements. They are much more likely to be from a large settlement area extending from the City walls to the tidal limits of the Stour, and therefore similar in form to the newly located sites outside the walls at York and London. Only later, with the total disruption of trade caused by the Viking invasions of the mid to later ninth century, would the one large settlement perhaps have shrunk to the later nuclei at Fordwich itself and around St. Augustine's Abbey and St. Martin's Church. With the revival of trade in the_ later tenth century these nuclei would have expanded as would the Northgate and Burgate (or Longport) linear suburbs. They would, however, have remained as separate areas with expanding populations, of 'bordars' and 'cottars' particularly, who probably gave their names to Colton manor (Northgate) and Caldecote Manor (St. Martin's).57 Much more field work is needed to prove this theory, but with the present evidence it is perhaps the most satisfactory explanation for the survival of the name Wic ( or later Wyke) in a remote corner of north-east Canterbury. A charter,58 dated A.D. 605, but most certainly an eleventh-century forgery, gives the bounds of St. Augustine's land: 'East the church of St. Martin and thence eastward by Sewennedown59 and so to the North by Wykengemearke. Again from the East southward by Burewaremearke ... '. This latter place, the boundary of the Burware must be Fishpool Bottom (i.e. the later County Borough boundary) while Wykengemearke must be the boundary of Wic. A 'royal vill' at St. Martin's in the sixth century, as postulated above, would fit very well into the general pattern of Kentish villae regales as revealed by both the pagan Anglo-Saxon cemeteries and the later documentary evidence. Sites like Milton Regis (near Sittingbourne), Faversham, Eastry and Dover are all situated beside tidal inlets which were ideal for a ruler like Aethelberht, much of whose time as 'Bretwalda' must have been spent travelling up and down the eastern seaboard of England. With the revival of cross-Channel (and North Sea) trade in the later sixth and seventh 56 Identified by Marion Archibald of the British Museum (see Part III, Appendix I). 57 See C. Dyer, 'Towns and Cottagers in eleventh Century England', in (Eds.) H. Mayr-Harting and R.I. Moore, Studies in Medieval History Presented to R.H.C. Davis (1985), 91-106. 58 Anglo-Saxon Charters, no. 3. 59 William Thorne's Chronicle of SI. Augusline's Abbey, Canterbury, ed. and trans. A.H. Davis (1934), 8-9, calls this 'Millehelle' (i.e. St. Martin's Hill). 204 EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL centuries, new trading settlements or wics were created and these places, coming under the control and the patronage of the kings, would most logically have been situated on similar open coastal sites close to the earlier vills. With the total disruption of this system by the Vikings, who themselves may in origin have been traders turned pirates (the name Viking itself perhaps suggests this), new fortified settlements or 'burghs' were required and the old 'royal vills' and wi􀁗 were no longer of any consequence. Hence many of them were granted away and in the tenth century St. Martin's passed to the archbishop. In the ninth century, however, the land at St. Martin's was still in the bands of the king, as can be seen by King Ethelred's gift of land there to 'his friend the priest Wighelm' in 867. Wighelm was given 'a seat at the place called St. Martin's Church and a small settlement (villula) there', a piece of land bounded by St. Augustine's Abbey, the common path north of the church, the main road and something obscure and hard to translate to the east, forming the south-west corner of the later ville of St. Martin, though this was extended to cover both sides of the road. A medieval tradition tried to make Wighelm a bishop at St. Martin's, but this is unlikely, especially as the gift of St. Martin's was a personal one, which Wighelm might leave as he chose at his death. 60 The fortunes of St. Martin's during the Viking invasions are at present unknown. The next charter evidence is not until the archiepiscopate of Dunstan (960-88) when he gave a house and fourteen acres of ground within the City to 'St. Martin and those who serve God there'. This implies that the church was being served by a small community of priests who had endowments and some sort of corporate life. It is possible that Dunstan may have encouraged the setting up of such a community out of respect for the historic church, or found the group in being and wished to help them. His interest can probably be linked with his reconsecration in 978 of the enlarged abbey church to the west to the honour of St. Augustine as well as that of SS. Peter and Paul, at a time of monastic reform and concern for English Christian origins. 61 60 Anglo-Saxon Charters, no. 338, discussed by N. Brooks, The Early History of the Church of Canterbury (1984), 34, and C.F. Routledge, The History of St. Martin's Church, Canterbury (1891), 85-9. For Wighelm, see (Ed.) W.H. Frere. Visitation Articles and Injunctions, (1910), I, 36-7 (Alcuin Club Collections, XIV). 61 Anglo-Saxon Charters, no. 287 with endorsement, discussed by Brooks, The Early History of the Church of Canterbury, 34 (but note that only 14 acres were given, not 24 as stated. 205 JONATHAN RADY It is reasonable to suppose that the community continued in being and in 1035 it was utilised to provide a title and an entourage for a 'bishop at St. Martin's', who acted as chorepiscopus or assistant to the archbishop of Canterbury. The first was Eadsige, who succeeded as archbishop in 1038. He appointed Siward, Abbot of Abingdon, as chorepiscopus in 1044 and after Siward's resignation, Godwine in 1048. After Godwine's death in 1061, the experiment was not repeated and by the time of Domesday Book the settlement at St. Martin's was in the hands of the archbishop. Within two hundred years the ownership appears to have moved from the king to a private person, then to a community of priests and then (perhaps as a result of the chorepiscopus having his seat at St. Martin's) to the archbishop. 62 The ville called St. Martin's occurs in Domesday Book and in the Domesday surveys of Christ Church Priory and St. Augustine's Abbey as part of Stursaete or Westgate, a slightly obscure title for the archbishop's extra-mural land around Canterbury, presumably notionally put together for ease of administration. The main holding of Westgate was west of Canterbury, but Thanington and Milton were also included, as well as Nackington and St. Martin's. There is evidence that the archbishop also owned land at Wic east of St. Martin's in the 1070s. By 1086, he held about 300 acres (1½ sulungs) 'at St. Martin's', roughly the same area as the later manor of Caldecote, of which 200 acres was his demesne, worth £7, and 100 acres were let, worth £4. There was a small wood, (probably Turrolt Wood) and there were seven burgesses in Canterbury who together paid 8s. 4d., whose houses were probably part of the endowment of the St. Martin's clergy.63 This was the state of affairs when Lanfranc came to Canterbury as archbishop in 1070. It was said by one of his biographers that he appointed no more bishops at St. Martin's, but clearly he found an alternative method of providing episcopal assistance in his appointments to Rochester. His first bishop, Arnost, only lived for a few months and was succeeded by Gundulph, who had come to Canterbury with Lanfranc in 1070 as his administrative assistant. Gundulph ruled his own diocese and acted as deputy for Lanfranc and later to Anselm, until his death in 1108. It is possible that for 62 Visitation ArticleJ and Injunctions, 38-40, and Brooks, op. cit., 295-6 and 299-300. 63 (Ed.) D.C. Douglas, DomeJday Monachorum of Christ Church, Canterbury, (1944), 82; for Wic, see notes 51 and 52 above; 318 acres in Caldecote, Canterbury Archives and Library, Canterbury, Register S, fol. 375. 206 EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL some years St. Martin's continued to be the Canterbury property of the Bishops of Rochester in their capacity as assistants to the archbishop. At the time of the gift of a spring for the Christ Church Priory water supply about 1160, Archbishop Theobald addresses his brother Walter, Bishop of Rochester, and the whole Hallmote of St. Martin's, informing them that he is making this grant of land within the St. Martin's estate. It is hard to see why the bishop of Rochester should be mentioned unless he had some rights at St. Martin's.64 The name hallmote for the court or meeting of tenants suggests a private jurisdiction, and in a Christ Church rental of about 1206 there is mention of 'land belonging to the soke of Saint Martin'. Rent was paid by Christ Church to the Court of St. Martin's65 for a piece of land between the church and the main road. Clearly for a time the ville of St. Martin's was thought to have an independent existence apart from the Domesday hundred of Westgate, and quite removed from the City of Canterbury. It may be that in the early thirteenth century there was still some legacy from the days when St. Martin's had been a small community of priests and the seat of the assistant bishops. Even when the ville of St. Martin was only occupied by the parish church and the archbishop's (or later the prior's) tenants, it retained some independence from the city. When their customs were reviewed in 1293 and 1313, the citizens claimed that it was part of Burgate ward, and that the tenants owed suit of court there, but this was resisted and St. Martin's was said to be in Kent and 'near' or 'outside' Canterbury. As a concession 12d. a year was paid to Burgate, but the citizens were still complaining in 1428.66 In Elizabethan subsidy rolls for the city the St. Martin's contributors are listed in a separate section at the end of Burgate, headed 'The Burrow of St. Martin's'. Although they had to pay the tax they kept their identity. The relationship with the city was still being discussed in legal arguments about 1600 and later.67 64 R.A.L. Smith, 'The Place of Gundulph in the Anglo-Norman Church', Collected Papers (1947), 86-92; for the grant of water see R. Willis, 'The Architectural History of the Conventual Buildings of the Monastery of Christ Church in Canterbury', Arch. Cant., vii (1868), 181. 65 C.A.L.C., Register H, printed in W. Urry, Canterbury Under the Angevin Kings (London 1967), 347. 66 W. Somner, The Antiquities of Canterbury, (Ed.) N. Battely (1703), Appendix 4; C.A.L.C., Ch. Ant. C 1232, (Eds.) R.W. Hunt et al., Studies in Medieval History presented to F.M. Powicke (1948), 398. 67 E.g. C.A.L.C., City Records, BCS III, 30, 1587; Finch v. Finch as seen in papers at Kent Archives Office, U449.L2 and C.A.L.C., City Records, Woodruff XII. 207 JONATHAN RADY By the early thirteenth century the western boundary of the ville of St. Martin was the wall, protecting the St. Augustine's Abbey cellarer's garden (on the site which is now the prison). The Rector of St. Martin's in 1330, John de Bourne, and his brother George, assisted in the escape over the wall of Peter of Dene, an illustrious but difficult legal expert who had taken refuge at the abbey. They climbed up and threw down a ladder into the garden. Outside they had horses and they took Peter of Dene to hide in George's house at Bishopsbourne. 68 John de Bourne's predecessor as rector, Robert de Henny and his schoolmaster, John de Brewen, were in trouble in 1321. The little community in the houses at St. Martin's had its own school on church land, but grammar scholars from the City had been taken in. The schoolmaster was reprimanded and told that he should only have thirteen local grammar scholars in the school. There was no limitation on those learning the alphabet, psalter and singing, so that the children of the ville could learn their letters. 69 In 1326 there was a change of ownership at St. Martin's: the manor of Caldecote was given to Christ Church Priory by Archbishop Reynolds, in order that the monks might have a place of recreation in the clear air above the Stour valley mist. 70 This gift presumably included the rents in St. Martin's, which were added to those of Colton in Northgate parish and given to the monastic Bartoner at the Sturry Road Mill (Barton Mill) except for the 3s. rent anciently paid by Christ Church to the Court of St. Martin's, which was accounted for as a 3s. 2d. rent paid into the Treasurer's Office. All these rents were gavelkind rents, rents in lieu of services, since the priory did not own the houses (they did own houses and shops in Canterbury, but not in St. Martin's until they acquired one house in the 1520s). The 3s. 2d. rent can be traced in the Treasurer's books from 1349. In the early rentals of the twelfth century this land was said to be between the church and the main roa􀁡, without boundaries to the east and west. Probably it was the corner plot bounding to the old Saxon road or church lane. By 1349, it had been divided into three tenements, and by 1433 into four tenements. The early fifteenth century was a time of expansion in St. Martin's street: four 'shops' were made near the 3s. 2d. rental - perhaps only booths in front of existing houses, and a new house was built on the corner plot made 68 William Thorne's Chronicle, 465-6; T. Tatton-Brown, 'Three Benedictine Houses', Arch. Cant., c (1984), 182. 69 B.L. Woodcock, Medieval Ecclesiastical Courts in the Diocese of Canterbury (1952), 126-31. 70 Somner, AntiquiJies, 132. 208 EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL available by the change in line of church lane. 71 A fortunate survival of a detailed Barton rental for about 1430 shows six tenants along the northern street frontage, a further tenant in what was later 'the Great House' (now called St. Martin's Priory) and another occupying the field towards the churchyard. There were at least eight houses on the other side of the road.72 From the rentals and material from wills collected by Routledge a picture can be built up of a settled and prosperous small community at St. Martin's from c. 1430-1540. Families lived there for two or three generations, with brothers sometimes living a few houses from each other. A tradition of ropemaking was established: the craftsmen included the occupier of the site excavated, John Stock, who in 1549 left his supplies of hemp and his workshop for the use of his workmen u.ntil his son Bartholomew should have learned 'the seyence of the roper's crafte'. The Bochard family had a rope workshop on the south side of the street adjoining their house and a little cottage by the gate. They made careful wills and left silver spoons and a cup harnessed with silver and a mazer bowl and quantities of bedding and clothes.73 After the dissolution of Christ Church Priory and the arrival of the New Foundation in 1541, the houses of St. Martin's belonged to the new Dean and Chapter, and new quit rents were due. The rest of the C􀁰ldecote Manor had been taken into the King's Park in 1538. All the rents formerly belonging to the Bartoner appear in lists of 'rents iri Caldecote manor', but the figures have been increased. The 3s. 2d. rent cannot be traced. The first rental can be dated about 1545; familiar names occur Coppyn, Nash, Laurance, Barham and the Stock family who lived at the house on the excavated site. At Christ Church House, or the Great House, was John Wilde, the auditor to the Dean and Chapter, who was said to be of 'good family' from Cheshire. He and his son and grandson were to be of importance at St. Martin's. 74 A census of 1563 shows there were probably about 23 hpuseholds, not including the Great House. Gilbert Hyde, also auditor to the Dean and Chapter and married to John Wilde's widow, lived in a substantial house on the south side of the road opposite Church Lane, and John Cosby, a successful brewer, had a house and brewhouse on the site next to that excavated. There were four 71 C.A.L.C., Misc. Accounts, 20, 25 (1422) up to 29. 72 C.A.L.C., Church Commissioners' Deposit, 70354, rentals A and B (?1425 and 1430). 73 Routledge, St. Martin's Church, 98-115. 74 C.A.L.C., Ch. Comm. Deposit, 70352, rental c. 1545. 209 JONATH AN RADY weavers, a tailor, a tyler, two labourers and two widows. Some occupations are not stated, and some households are 'lost' where the top of the page has been torn. Only three households are marked as poor.75 In the later sixteenth century there grew up what might be called the 'Ash connection'. Thomas Stoughton of Ash-next-Sandwich lived in St. Martin's from the 1580s and his daughter married John Wilde's son Thomas. Members of the Ash families of Quilter and Omer owned houses in the Street. Sir Thomas Harfleete rented the Great House, at least from 1607 until his death in 1617. Rather later, in the 1640s, some houses in St. Martin's were in the hands of the Paramore family. Was it perhaps convenient for business interests to have a house 'near' but 'outside' Canterbury? A detailed rental of 1607 shows that Thomas Wilde had died and his son John Wilde, gent., later Sir John, Auditor to the Dean and Chapter, had acquired most of the houses on the north side of the Street and the land behind them, including the house on the excavated site which he bought from Bartholomew Stock.76 Until Wilde's death in 1635 the Great House, the field and the houses on its edge made a neat parcel of family property. The situation after 1635 is obscure, since there are no further rentals until after the Commonwealth 'interregnum' at the Cathedral. In 1649, the Burghmote of the City of Canterbury began to take a new interest in the field behind the houses; they were in need of a new water supply and a new site on the spring line was required for a conduit. A committee negotiated with Mr Cheney Ebourne at the Great House. The conduit head was installed at the north-east corner of the field, on the boundary with the Great House. The pipes probably ran down the hill near the churchyard and under the present drive to St. Martin's Priory, as the Great House is now called. No sign of pipes was found in the excavation. Sir Henry Palmer, the next occupant of the Great House, permitted the City to use the spring by arral!foement as before. A suitable present was made to Lady Palmer. 7 After the 'interregnum', when the Dean and Chapter had returned, a new rental for St. Martin's was drawn up in 1662. A new entrepreneur had taken over, Mr George Bingham, who owned the malthouse next to the excavated site, once belonging to John Cosby, also a brewer, and the two houses to the east. He rented two 75 C.A.L.C., City Records E.Q.I., discussed by P. and J. Clarke, in (Eds.) A. Detsicas and N. Yates, Studies in modern Kentish History (1983), 65-86. 76 C.A.L.C., Ch. Comm. Deposit, 70352, rental 1607. 77 F. Jenkins, 'Troubled Waters', Sparks, St. Martin and St. Paul, 71-5. 210 EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL tenements beside the Church Lane ( one of which was partially excavated, see Fig. 11) and had the large house formerly the residence of Gilbert Hyde, in use as an inn called 'The Sign of Sandwich'.78 He did not own the excavated site and the field, which belonged to Edward Baker. The City . authorities arranged for Bingham to be in charge of the water supply, but this proved unsuccessful since Bingham simply diverted the water for the use of his malthouse. The City went to law with him, but he alleged that he was exempt from their jurisdiction, being within the Borough of St. Martin's and the manor of Caldecote. The case went to the King's Bench in 1673 and the verdict was in favour of the City. In the same year the house and field formerly belonging to Edward Baker were bought by the City Chamberlain from Mark Berry a member of the Burghmote, presumably with the intention that access to the Conduit Meadow should belong to the City as of right. It was paid for with £166 from Henry Robinson's Charity of 1642 for setting out apprentices into trades. Mark Berry's brother William was the first tenant in the house. The transaction appears irregular since Squire Beverton, the then Chamberlain, never conveyed the house and land to the Mayor and commonalty. However, they included the house and field in the city property, as if it had been conveyed. After William Berry's death the property was let to Richard Drury who was to take care of the water, waterworks and pipes in the field, which were presumably in the north-eastern part (6 rods by 4 rods) (see Fig. 12) originally let by Edward Baker to George Bingham when he was in charge of the waterworks. 79 The City's use of the conduit continued through the eighteenth century. New pipes were laid after an Inspection in 1705, when search was also 'made in the great chest of the chamber for the deeds of the house and malthouse at St. Martin's Hill that the same may be perused by Mr. Recorder'. The Doidges' map of 1752 shows a drive to the conduit house with trees each side. In 1769, the City took in hand the garden near the conduit house, and laid further new pipes the next year. The rent for the house and garden was correspondingly reduced. After 1782, the field was let to the occupant of the Great House, and by 1792 the house or houses on St. Martin's Hill had been demolished. In 1822, a new water company was formed, with a tank at the Castle keep and the conduit meadow was no longer required. But the 78 C.A.L.C., Ch. Comm. Deposit 70352, rental 1662. 79 C.A.L.C., Bunce, Terrar Rental (of the property of the city), 302-5, contains copies of various deeds relating to this property between 1673 and 1792. 211 ' JONATHAN RADY members of the Burghmote found themselves in a new difficulty concerning this property. In January 1838, the Attorney-General filed a Bill in Chancery against them, for failing to use Robinson's Charity since 1739, as a result of the Commission of Inquiry concerning municipal charities. The property was conveyed to the Charitable Trustees to hold for the charity in May 1840. 80 Since that time the ownership of the field is very obscure. At the time of the restoration of St. Martin's Church by Daniel Finch and W.J. Chesshyre the churchyard appears to have been extended into the area formerly the drive to the conduit house, and a new lychgate was put up in 1844. Raze's drawing of 1853 shows the lychgate, a new wall to the churchyard and cows in the conduit meadow. By the time of the O.S. map of 1873 a fenced drive had been made to the outhouses behind the Great House. There were further changes in the years 1933-6, when the Great House, by then called 'St. Martin's Priory', was left to the parish of St. Martin for use as a rectory or for sale.81 The field was included in this bequest. In the event the house was sold to Bishop Rose, the Bishop of Dover, who extended it to the west and made a wider drive along the edge of the churchyard. What remained of the field was not sold and was kept by the parish as glebe. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The excavation, the subsequent preparation of this report and the compilation of the archive, were financed by the H.B.M.C. Much of the labour force was supplied by the M.S.C. Scheme. Thanks are due to all Trust staff, diggers and the volunteers, in particular Jane Elder, Julia Curtis, Andrew Savage, Damian Hone and Tempest Hay, who often had to endure very wet and cold conditions. I am particularly grateful to Ian Anderson who assisted with much of the supervisory work, including the direction of most of the excavation of Trench E, to John Bowen for his assistance with the excavation drawings and to Maggy Sasanow for her drawings of the small finds. The final report has been considerably enhanced by the comprehensive survey by Margaret Sparks and Tim Tatton-Brown of the documentary and historical aspects of the area, and thanks are due to them for reading 80 Digest of the Reports made by the Commissioners of Inquiry into Charities (1841), 274; C.A.L.C., City Minute Book, 1836-44, 157, 173 and 206. 81 C.A.L.C., St. Martin's Parochial Church Council Minute Book, 1922-50, November 1933, July 1934, February 1945. 212 EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL and commenting upon the excavation text. I would also like to thank Jane Elder, Janet Strugnell and Elizabeth Edwards for their rapid preparation of the final typed copy. Thanks are also extended to the Royal Museum, Canterbury, for permission to publish details of the two coins of Offa in Appendix I. 213 JONATHAN RADY PLATE I St. Martin's Hill 1984: Trench A: Floor Levels of Building M2A from South. (Scale: 0.50m.) 214 EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HILL PLATE II St. Martin's Hill 1984: Trench A: Pit 40 showing in situ Horse Skeleton from North. (Scale: 0.50m.) St. Martin's Hill 1984: Trench B: Building (Scale: I m.) 215 PLATE JII M3 from North. JONATHAN RADY PLATE IV St. Martin's Hill 1984: Trench B: Hearth 2421242A from South. (Scale: 0.50 m.) PLATE V St. Martin's Hill 1984: Trench B: Drain 262 from West. (Scale: 0.50 m.) 216 EXCAVATIONS AT ST. MARTIN'S HJLL PLATE VI St. Martin's Hill 1984: Well 2 from South. (Scale: 2 m.) PLATE VII St. Martin's Hill 1984: Nos. 1-13 St. Martin's Hill. 217 JONATHAN RADY PLATE VIII St. Martin"s Hill 1984: Trench A: Building PI and rear Courtyard from North. (Scales: 0.50 m.) PLATE IX St. Martin"􀁫 llill 1984: Trench B: Building P2 from South. (Scale: 2 rn.) 218

Previous
Previous

Desmaistres as the Origin of the Name Demetrius in the James Family of Ightham

Next
Next

The Jutish Cemetery at Half Mile Ride, Margate: A Re-appraisal